|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I have repeated numerous times, Clyde's analysis proves nothing ( flawed)
since it does not register pivots that fall in the "right" levels to measure
the real fib extensions or retracements (it measures all pivots, thus the
flat line), what else would one expect from such an analysis? This was
challenged a while back and numerous members stand by it move on, let it go,
. . . .
don ewers
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kent Rollins" <kentr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 8:39 PM
Subject: [RT] Re:
> There is a saying: "The plural of 'anecdotes' is not 'data'." Just
because
> you can find a few instances on a chart proves you are handy with charts.
>
> Clyde did a data-packed study of retracements and posted the results in a
> very clear and incontrovertible chart which had the length of retracements
> on 1 axis and the frequency of occurances on the other. There was NO blip
> at the magical Fibonacci numbers. None. The data line was perfectly
smooth
> from one side of the chart to the other with no clump at any point.
>
> Fib retracements are a prism thru which to view the strength of market
> moves. Fib numbers have no statistical basis in fact. You could just as
> easily use sixths, eights, tenths, or any other fraction. And for every
> chart you post should a perfect Fib retracement, I could post one that
shows
> a perfect retracement based on PI, e, or any other rational number.
>
> Kent
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Don Ewers" <dbewers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 3:35 PM
>
>
> Clyde,
> It is not a very few examples, as you have "continued to state".
>
> Your posisition seems to be, if you can't "program it", it does not exist?
>
> I say, every day, in every time frame, I use it constantly, almost more
than
> any other tool. What you call " isolated" occurs all the time, and it is
> "not isolated"?
>
> Here are a couple of other weekly "fib things" that as you would say, do
not
> exist that I recently supplied to one who inquired about retracements.
> First two look pretty good to me (blue 50% and the red .618) of the prior
> moves down so far. Would they show up on what you have tried to program?
>
> Keep fighting this, but you are losing the battle from what I normally
> trade, as it would appear may others.
> don ewers
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Clyde Lee" <clydelee@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 11:22 AM
> Subject: Re: [RT] Why Fibonacci Numbers work and Number crunching doesn't
>
>
> > What I believe in and what I publish may be two entirely
> > different things. You have never seen a published study
> > by me that indicated that Gann Angle projection of time
> > or price reversal points had any more significance than
> > a random choice of points.
> >
> > My publication of Gann Angle points was just an observation
> > and not an analysis.
> >
> > Why it is that you insist on selecting A VERY FEW examples
> > of FIB relationships that seem to work a proof that such is the
> > case I do not understand.
> >
> > I understand that many people use FIB relationships in
> > discretionary trading as a guide to where price reversals might
> > occur but I have yet to see anyone publish a trading system
> > based on the FIB ratios that was successful. And, in view
> > of the statistical data which has been accumulated it is highly
> > unlikely that it will.
> >
> > My whole purpose of this insistence of looking at the statistics
> > of Fib ratios is to try to prevent some of our newer and less
> > experienced colleagues from jumping off onto a train that is
> > headed for hell.
> >
> > Clyde
> >
> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> > Clyde Lee Chairman/CEO (Home of SwingMachine)
> > SYTECH Corporation email: clydelee@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > 7910 Westglen, Suite 105 Office: (713) 783-9540
> > Houston, TX 77063 Fax: (713) 783-1092
> > Details at: www.theswingmachine.com
> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Adrian Pitt" <apitt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 6:48 AM
> > Subject: [RT] Why Fibonacci Numbers work and Number crunching doesn't
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Clyde and all those interested,
> > >
> > > Have a look at the enclosed graph. It shows very clearly a perfect
> > > example Of the implementation of Fibonacci ratio's at work, and why
> > > Clyde's number crunching statistical tour de force shows up nothing.
> > > This graph is a daily Bar chart of the Dow, looking at the major high
> > > and the corrective rally we have had this year. Notice that the
> > > corrective rally finished in a classic Neely Triangle, as so many
> > > multi-wave corrective structures do. Also notice That at that exact
> > > moment we completed the 'e' wave of the triangle was also the EXACT
> > > 61.8% retracement of the major decline so far. Also note, that with
> > > almost Any swing methodology applied to this market would never have
> > > caught this. If You go to a weekly or monthly chart that termination
> > > point vanishes and so does The 61.8% retracement, thereby seemingly
> > > proving Clyde's assertion. Clyde, You do some great work, but it seems
> > > there are 2 anomalies here..the first is You seem to believe in Gann
> > > angles but not Fibonacci? That's is an unusual Combination to the say
> > > the least. Secondly, don't let yourself fall into the camp University
> > > academics have for the past decades of trying to prove markets were
> > > Random and technical analysis had no validity by conducting spurious
and
> > > erroneous Test. Doing a number crunching test...no matter how detailed
> > > and intensive does NOT Prove something doesn't work simply because
your
> > > test didn't show it.
> > > This is why I sent this simple little graph. The combination of
Elliott
> > > and Fibo working a treat. These aren't isolated examples, and there is
> > > no one on the
> > > planet who could ever suggest we stopped at that point because
"everyone
> > > looks at charts..so they were watching the 61.8% level".
> > >
> > > Adrian Pitt
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.370 / Virus Database: 205 - Release Date: 6/6/02
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.370 / Virus Database: 205 - Release Date: 6/6/02
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Save on REALTOR Fees
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Xw80LD/h1ZEAA/Ey.GAA/zMEolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|