[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RT] Re: forecasting-track record



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links




Rakesh,
All I can say is the standard entries in AGET 
normally put too much money at risk IMO.  As I progresses in their 
trading and frankly with the help of another list RT member (who shall go 
un-named) who was adament about not trading breakouts, only retracements did the 
"wave 2" concept become a major part of my trading and the understanding of 
why.  I also hope this was also a good explanation for him as to why he was 
doing what he was doing, in the first place.  Sit down and draw the whole 
structure  (and substructure) that "should" occur and you will see 
why "wave 2's" are a better entry.  I have no idea why AGET has not 
promoted this in their literature or seminars, other than a new user is not 
ready to accept the "entire" sub structure concept and it is a big leap to get 
them to understand the larger one.  Let me say that this, it  is not 
just about EW, I believe both Fibs and Gann lines and "other things", in 
the final analysis all are in essence really all the same thing, just viewed 
from different perspectives.  It takes work to see the 
transparency.
 
Forget EW, but if the direction of the market has a 
three wave structure it as corrective to the prior trend, if a clear five 
wave consider it with the trend, start with that?
don ewers
<BLOCKQUOTE 
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  <DIV 
  style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From: 
  Rakesh Sahgal 
  
  To: <A 
  href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"; 
  title=realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 9:28 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [RT] Re: forecasting-track 
  record
  Hi Don,How would you go about identifying a wave 2 end 
  in AGET ? Have you done any work in this direction? Do the osciullator studies 
  etc help any or one has to be absolutely proficient in in EW to be able to 
  recognise wave 2 entry points?RakeshAt 01:59 PM 7/11/02 
  -0500, you wrote:
  <FONT face=arial 
    size=2>Nick,There is some real true to 
    what you are saying.  In one of the "early" AGET trading tapes I have, 
    Tom Joseph (AGET originator), drew the waves just as you described, 
    basically he ignored waves 1 and 2 and really analyzed it as a three wave 
    affair.  This may be because the recommended trades at that time were, 
    Type 1 after a wave 4 was over and Type 2 after a wave 5 was over.  
     There is a reason though to pay 
    attention to wave 2's. From my experience, is that is the single best entry 
    point due to it's low risk and defineable stop.  This is true for all 
    wave 2's, albeit it a minor wave 2 of wave 1, a regular wave 2, minor wave 
    2's of wave 3's and minor wave 2 of wave 5's.  Basically trading the 
    pullback.don ewers
    ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Nick Ali 
      To: <A 
      href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
      Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 12:23 PMSubject: Re: 
      [RT] Re: forecasting-track recordI have to say EW always seemed to 
      have too many if this then thats. I found it confusing so have never 
      really persued his techniques past basic theory.  I recently read a 
      book by Tony Plumber (I think) and it all made loads more sense. In a 
      nutshell he pointed out that markets move in 3 wave cycles. If you join 
      together two  3 wave movements (in the same direction) you get the 
      'classic' 5 wave with the 1 of the second cycle of waves joining the 3 of 
      the first (its much much easier when drawn). It all becomes much easier 
      when you are using the smallest 'building block' to make up your patterns. 
       Cheers,Nick. To unsubscribe from 
      this group, send an email 
      to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYour 
      use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A 
      href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>Yahoo! Terms of Service. 
      ---Outgoing mail is certified Virus 
      Free.Checked by AVG anti-virus system (<A 
      href="http://www.grisoft.com";>http://www.grisoft.com).Version: 
      6.0.370 / Virus Database: 205 - Release Date: 
    6/6/02To unsubscribe from this group, send an 
    email 
    to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYour 
    use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A 
    href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>Yahoo! Terms of Service. 
                                                                          Rakesh 
  Sahgal                                                                        C 
  -165(1st Floor), Greater Kailash - 
  I,                                                                        New 
  Delhi - 110 
  048                                                                        India.                                                                        Tel.: 
  91-11-647-6462                                                                        eMail:  r_sahgal@xxxxxxxxxx                                                                                rsahgal@xxxxxxxxTo 
  unsubscribe from this group, send an email 
  to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYour 
  use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A 
  href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>Yahoo! Terms of Service. 




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx





Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.