|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Howard,
I thought I explained that by saying that Hurst and many others
believe that a 2 to 1 relationship between cycle measurements
provides the better basis for evaluating advantageous points for
entry.
The resolution capability of the Fourier line spectra method would
lead one not to use lines that (one a % basis) have little separation.
Clyde
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Clyde Lee Chairman/CEO (Home of SwingMachine)
SYTECH Corporation email: clydelee@xxxxxxxxxxxx
7910 Westglen, Suite 105 Office: (713) 783-9540
Houston, TX 77063 Fax: (713) 783-1092
Details at: www.theswingmachine.com
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
----- Original Message -----
From: <hbernst963@xxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2002 6:22 AM
Subject: Re: [RT] What happened to the Hurst cycle?
> Clyde,
>
> Why didn't you use 160 and 189 days since they had higher amplitudes than
59, 73 and 123?
>
> Howard Bernstein
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Free $5 Love Reading
Risk Free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Pp91HA/PfREAA/Ey.GAA/zMEolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|