|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Kent,
I have been sharing information and making public forecasts on my web site
and on list list for over four years. The items offered for sale on my web
site are there because people have asked for them, not because I am actively
marketing them. In fact , they were just offered in the past month.
The reason I responded to John was the following statement in his message:
"I have seen few people go out on the limb, including RT and Median
> Line , and make a prognostication for the next day based upon their
> analysis. I was testing the waters for the accurate feasability of
> this."
I did error in not responding directly to John instead of replying to the
list message but it was easier to do that way. So please back up your
statement that I have trolled this list before.
Regards,
Jim White
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kent Rollins" <kentr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, June 23, 2002 11:04 AM
Subject: Re: [RT] Tradetalk accurate wall street forecasts
> Jim White runs a website purportedly devoted to pivot trading where he
sells
> an indicator module for $500 and a mentoring service for $5000. If he
> wanted to share information or make a market call, he could easily have
done
> so without advertising. He has trolled in the past on this list and I
> suggest that this email is a troll.
>
> Kent
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jim White" <jwhite43@xxxxxxx>
> To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, June 23, 2002 10:44 AM
> Subject: Re: [RT] Tradetalk accurate wall street forecasts
>
>
> John,
> I have just completed a two week test, with a California day trading firm,
> of making daily recommendations based on my Near Impulse model and a daily
> direction indicator I am developing. I will not attach the summary results
> here for fear of "soliciting" however if you are interested , I will send
to
> you privately.
> Jim
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Cappello" <jvc689@xxxxxxx>
> To: "Michael.O" <beeline@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, June 23, 2002 2:44 AM
> Subject: [RT] Tradetalk accurate wall street forecasts
>
>
> > Michael,
> >
> > If I was "implicitly" promoting something it was something you
> > inferred. I have already communicated with the moderator on this and
> > what transpired was all news to me.I told him I would merely complete
> > any thread and leave the spamming subject alone.
> >
> > The point of my post was the merit or non-merit of Specialist
> > inventory as a predicter of market action. I said I went to the site
> > and saw a weeks worth of decent calls. It had nothimg to do with the
> > originater as to what I knew at the time. I have been in enough feuds
> > to know when to avoid them but also to give my side of the story.
> >
> > I have seen few people go out on the limb, including RT and Median
> > Line , and make a prognostication for the next day based upon their
> > analysis. I was testing the waters for the accurate feasability of
> > this.
> >
> > I also spoke of Babson who died in 1967 and published a well regarded
> > news letter.
> >
> > So my posts were multi faceted and not even implicitly promoting any
> > one person. I had no idea there were axes to grind over spamming and
> > individual personalities.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> > John
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------ Reply Separator --------------------
> > Originally From: "Michael.O" <beeline@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: [RT] Tradetalk accurate wall street forecasts
> > Date: 06/23/2002 02:31pm
> >
> >
> > Ask the Moderators (& most others ),..over at the MedianLine forum
> > about
> > this guy, whose site you are implicitly promoting here ...he
> > utilizes,.....
> > interesting marketing techniques.
> > Michael
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "John Cappello" <jvc689@xxxxxxx>
> > To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Sunday, June 23, 2002 9:42 AM
> > Subject: [RT] Tradetalk accurate wall street forecasts
> >
> >
> > > Dear Kent,
> > >
> > > I neither looked up the price nor promoted what I posted. Those
> > > questions were not mine but came from the person who sent it to me.
> > >
> > > I looked at the results posted for the past week based upon
> > > Specialists Inventory and they seemed on target for the last
> > > week.They went out on the limb with a June 24 prognostication.
> > >
> > > I think that anytime there is some new idea which "could" have merit
> > > that it is interesting enough to share...but that is just me.
> > >
> > > They could be a scam and so could those offering Gann and others
> > > works. There is a free trial to which I subscribed and I will know
> > > more after that.
> > >
> > > Sincerely,
> > >
> > > John
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------ Reply Separator --------------------
> > > Originally From: "Kent Rollins" <kentr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Subject: Re: [RT] Tradetalk accurate wall street forecasts
> > > Date: 06/22/2002 02:53pm
> > >
> > >
> > > So this system that sells for $1975 plus $4 shipping had a good call
> > > on 1
> > > day. And we don't really know if they (you?) had a good call
> > because
> > > the
> > > call was only disclosed at the close of the market.
> > >
> > > You said "Thought what is below is good enough to share." Why do
> > you
> > > think
> > > we would be interested in "Long setups is at 5 and short setups is
> > at
> > > three."? There is no information content there. Most of us are
> > smart
> > > enough to know that this is another scam. This scam doesn't even
> > make
> > > claims about past performance. Which leads to my next question.
> > >
> > > You said "How does this work? How accurate is it?" Well, I went to
> > > the
> > > website prepared for some tall tales of market success and I
> > couldn't
> > > find
> > > any. The link you posted to this very expensive system doesn't even
> > > answer
> > > the question you yourself posed: "How does this work? How accurate
> > is
> > > it?"
> > > The sample calls are from 1999 which for all we know may be the last
> > > time
> > > the system made a good call and the Live Charts link is broken.
> > >
> > > But hey, good post.
> > >
> > > Kent
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "John Cappello" <jvc689@xxxxxxx>
> > > To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: <MedianLine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2002 12:54 PM
> > > Subject: [RT] Tradetalk accurate wall street forecasts
> > >
> > >
> > > Thought what is below is good enough to share.
> > >
> > > John
> > >
> > >
> > > On Friday the indicators worked well with a brief rally in the
> > > morning to unchanged and then another small one in the afternoon.
> > > Prices drifted southward as forecast most of the day.
> > >
> > > Inventory is now at five. Long setups is at 5 and short setups is
> > > at three. Typically large rallies do not occur under these
> > > conditions. The low inventory number functions like a strong
> > > southward magnet.
> > >
> > > How does this work? How accurate is it?
> > > http://www.precisiontrader.com/index_analysis.htm
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------
> > ~-
> > > ->
> > > Free $5 Love Reading
> > > Risk Free!
> > > http://us.click.yahoo.com/3PCXaC/PfREAA/Ey.GAA/zMEolB/TM
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -
> > > ~->
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---
> > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> > Version: 6.0.371 / Virus Database: 206 - Release Date: 13/06/02
> >
> >
> > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-
> > ->
> > Free $5 Love Reading
> > Risk Free!
> > http://us.click.yahoo.com/3PCXaC/PfREAA/Ey.GAA/zMEolB/TM
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ~->
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Free $5 Love Reading
Risk Free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/3PCXaC/PfREAA/Ey.GAA/zMEolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|