[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RT] Re: SP foracast



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Hello Greg,

You  DID  say  first that "This is Hurst model in action. Proven to be
90%  accurate.  It  is  100%  automatic, mechanical and objective."

And  now  you're  saying that "It gives you an idea for the trade...",
"just one tool, not a mechanical trading system".

I  wonder  do  you really understand what words "automatic, mechanical
and  objective"  mean in context of trading or you use them just for a
case?

Best regards,
 Alex                            mailto:alex_bell@xxxxxxx


Monday, June 3, 2002, 10:26:44 AM, you wrote:

m> I can answer all these debating questions by saying, trading is an 
m> art and Hurst cycle indicator is a powerfull tool if you know how to 
m> use it. It ucovers geometric logic of the market for those who can 
m> respond to logic. It gives you an idea for the trade and magnitude, 
m> then you use other tools to nail it. So it gives right ideas 90% of 
m> the time
m> This is just one tool, not a mechanical trading system. Not yet. I 
m> didn't say it is.
m> If you refer to phisicality of the channel, you never understand 
m> what's for.
m> By the way, there are two types of traders. One type are trading on 
m> reversals, confirmations, break outs and other lagging indicators. 
m> They kind of glued to the screens and jumping on orders like monkeys.
m> Another type trade on pure idea of the market. They buy and sell 
m> before market reverse the direction.

m> If you are a monkey trader, you'll have real hard time understanding 
m> other style. The only hope for you is to gradually evolve.
m> 90% is possible as well as trading at tops and bottoms.

m> If some books say don't trade tops and bottoms, perhaps you are 
m> reading wrong books. 90% of them are.

m> Greg.  

m> P.S. Understanding things is an act of fortune. Good luck.



m> --- In realtraders@xxxx, Ira Tunik <irat@xxxx> wrote:
>> I don't know what is going on with Yahoogroups, but I sent this out 
m> at
>> about 6:30 this morning and it never got posted.  Here is the second
>> try.  Ira.
>> 
>> I read all this ridicule of Hurst and his channels and wonder if 
m> anyone
>> actually bothered to read the book, do the homework, and study the
>> results or if they just like
>> to draw lines and channels and postulate.  He did not use the 
m> channels
>> to project price, he used tangential extensions off of offset moving
>> averages to project price
>> and time.  So anyone who is using the channels to project price or
>> direction is going to be in a lot of trouble.  You don't need a 
m> formula
>> to draw the channels, you
>> can get the same effect with a series of straight lines connecting 
m> the
>> lows and parallels for the highs.  It is not the lines, the 
m> extensions,
>> or the ability to count that will
>> make Hurst's system work for you, it is understanding what he is 
m> trying
>> to prove and how it works and what its limitations are.  If I am not
>> mistaken, and I would
>> have to go back to the book to confirm this, that time impacts price
>> less then 30% of the time.  That leaves you over 70% of the time 
m> blowing
>> in the wind.  It is the
>> understanding of what is being used and its limitations and 
m> advantages
>> that will help you in your trading and not guess work based upon 
m> what
>> someone else says it is
>> supposed to do.  So if you believe that understanding times 
m> function in
>> price action will help your trading by the book and study it.  Try 
m> to
>> understand what he has
>> written not just read the words and look at the charts. Ira.
>> 
>> Adrian Pitt wrote:
>> 
>>    Metatrader,Can you please define what you mean by 90% accurate.
>> Please don't quote about past prices because every graph of Clyde's 
m> work
>> from
>>   www.theswingmachine.com (as you have shown us...) are all curved
>> fitted and rightly so..that's what Hurst bands do.  So the only 
m> relevant
>> statistic here is how accurate
>>   they are into the future.  So you would have to do extensive walk
>> forward testing. I'm assuming you have bought Clydes work and done 
m> this
>> extensive testing to derive
>>   your 90% figure?? Assuming you have, I would love to hear a little
>> more detail. Regards,Adrian Pitt



m> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
m> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

m> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Kwick Pick opens locked car doors,
front doors, drawers, briefcases,
padlocks, and more. On sale now!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/ehaLqB/Fg5DAA/Ey.GAA/zMEolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/