[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re[6]: [RT] Fibo predictions



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links




Clyde,
Just a thought but if I understand your chart 
correctly, it is comparing just "the ratio of any leg to prior leg difference in 
price".
 
What if the prior leg has "multiple legs" down like 
the SP cash from the high 1552.87 to the Sept low 969.73 and the resulting 
reaction up leg is multiple legs?
 
Does your study just cover just single swings to 
the prior swing and not multiple legs to multiple swing leg 
retracements?
don ewers
<BLOCKQUOTE 
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  <DIV 
  style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From: 
  Clyde Lee 
  
  To: <A 
  href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"; 
  title=realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 3:13 
  PM
  Subject: Re: Re[6]: [RT] Fibo 
  predictions
  
  What does it take to prove that Fib 
  numbers have no validity in
  estimating where prices might make a 
  turn.
   
  I have posted several charts which 
  clearly prove this is the 
  case and yet we continue to hear BS about 
  Fib numbers.
   
  Just to make it clear, here is an 
  explanation of the method
  behind the attached chart.
   
  Consider a swing such as the 
  following"
   
  <FONT face="Courier New" 
  size=2>        b
         / 
  \
        
  /   \
       
  /     \
      
  a       \
  <FONT face="Courier New" 
  size=2>             
  \ 
  <FONT face="Courier New" 
  size=2>              
  c
   
  and calculate the ratio  
  (b-a)/(b-c)
   
  or a swing of the following 
  type
   
      a
       \ 
        
  \
         
  \     c
  <FONT face="Courier New" 
  size=2>        \   /
  <FONT face="Courier New" 
  size=2>         \ /
  <FONT face="Courier New" 
  size=2>          b
   
  and calculate the ratio  
  (a-b)/(c-b)
   
  Do this with a mathematically definable 
  method
  of picking swings and accumulate the 
  ratios in
  a spread sheet, sort the data by ratio, 
  and make
  a chart.
   
  The attached is exactly that chart for 
  the S&P
  index from 1930 until now using an 8 bar 
  length
  window for picking pivots.
   
  A careful examination will indicate a 
  more or less
  CONTINUIOUS distribution of ratios of the 
  1713 swings
  which existed in the period of study and 
  had a ratio
  of less than 2.0.
   
  If there were ANY VALIDITY to the concept 
  of turning
  of prices at FIB levels then there would 
  be a bunching
  of data about the various FIB levels and 
  not the very
  continuous distribution that is found in 
  the data.
   
  Again, people may use the fib levels as 
  levels at
  which to be aware of potential turns in 
  direction of
  prices but the analysis says that we are 
  just as well
  off with a random set of lines since 
  there will not
  be any grouping around them 
  either.
   
  Please, examine these data in detail and 
  if I am
  missing something then provide the data 
  or interpretation
  of these data that says 
  otherwise.
   
  Clyde
   
  - - - - -     - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -  - 
  - - - - - -Clyde Lee   
  Chairman/CEO          (Home of 
  SwingMachine)SYTECH 
  Corporation          email: <A 
  href="mailto:clydelee@xxxxxxxxxxxx";>clydelee@xxxxxxxxxxxx  7910 
  Westglen, Suite 105       
  Office:    (713) 783-9540Houston,  TX  
  77063               
  Fax:    (713) 783-1092Details 
  at:                      
  www.theswingmachine.com- - - 
  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -  - - - - - - - -
  <BLOCKQUOTE 
  style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    <DIV 
    style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From: 
    ztrader 

    To: <A 
    href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"; 
    title=realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 1:37 
    PM
    Subject: Re[6]: [RT] Fibo 
    predictions
    On Saturday, April 13, 2002, 11:10:12 AM, wavemechanic 
    wrote:w>   Are you thinking that confluence is 
    associated with Fibs only?w>   Could it be extended to any 
    coincidence of indicators?w>   As long as the 
    indicators are truely different (e.g., velocity vs acceleration, 
    etc.).How about a 50 ma and a 200 ma with identical values, and 
    price isapproaching this value? Would this 'confluence' have more 
    importancethan if the two ma's had quite different 
    values?ztrader






Yahoo! Groups Sponsor


ADVERTISEMENT









To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx





Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.