[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RT] AOL



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links




Lee,
If I don't see a good wave 4 (credible with 5/35 to 
zero and an ABC with divergence between the A and the C on a 5/17) and 
subsequently a good minor wave 4 in wave 5 (use the 5/17 a lot for wave 5 
internal count), I generally as a rule won't trade it. 
 
It is these "foolers" that one learns through 
experience, in a reduction in their pocketbook, to respect :-)
 
Your lessor time frame is correct and pivotal, 
which is why I would recommend having the 60min charts. The problem is you 
can normally only get them using AGET data which is expensive, although I 
understand there are now methods to "get around that", pardon the 
pun.
don ewers
<BLOCKQUOTE 
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  <DIV 
  style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From: 
  Lee Morris 
  
  To: <A 
  href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"; 
  title=realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 2:15 
  PM
  Subject: RE: [RT] AOL
  
  <SPAN 
  class=010044718-10042002>There have been a lot of "foolers" recently, I would 
  like to hear how some people handle this aspect of Aget. The way I have been 
  trying to deal with this is using the assumption that if you can determine 
  which wave is in control at that time then most lesser time frames will 
  normally complete 5 waves before turning. Right now I believe that we are near 
  the end of this down move and so many of the dailies need to be satisfied most 
  have not gotten to their wave 5 targets so I would treat the rally today as a 
  w4 of w5 and either cut my size and/or go down to a small time frame to 
  protect against a complex w4. The only issue with this is I do not have a well 
  defined point as to when I concede that a low is in and an impulse wave has 
  started.
  
    <FONT face=Tahoma 
    size=2>-----Original Message-----From: Don Ewers 
    [mailto:dbewers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 
    2:40 PMTo: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxSubject: Re: 
    [RT] AOLBobKC,Here is the 60min chart on AOL (I 
    added the daily again if needed forreference).It is just looking 
    at the price structure from minor wave 4 of wave 5 on thedaily 
    (basically the point where the regression channels start on the 
    dailychart).  If the pattern is correct, then it is in the extended 
    wave 3 rangewhich only happens 8% of the time.  In otherwords a 
    time to tighten stops ifone were short or cover. What could happen from 
    here is a wave 4 rally onthe 60min, followed by another final wave 5 
    decline (provided the PTI stayshigh enough, currently 99) that might 
    reach down into the refined area shownon the daily.The wave 4 
    rally could trigger a "false buy on the daily" (braking theregression 
    lines and 6/4 ma), which I call the "fooler", until pattern is"really" 
    done.As an add on I have not used 60min charts on stocks all that 
    much (do oncommodities though) so this falls in the FWIW department 
    (meaning littleexperience as to the accuracy).don ewers----- 
    Original Message -----From: Don Ewers 
    <dbewers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>To: 
    <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:05 
    PMSubject: Re: [RT] AOL> BobKC,> Here is what AGET 
    is saying on a daily chart FWIW.>> Price is definitely into 
    some support areas including the MOB's and just> entering the wave 5 
    target range (I also did an "internal" wave projection> of just wave 
    5 which shows an even more refineded target range which "may"> come 
    into play as well).>> Typical trade rules would require a 
    break of the regression channels orthe> 6/4 ma channels to 
    trigger a buy. I will look at a 60min to see if it> reveals anything 
    more in detail.  If so I will post it.> don ewers> ----- 
    Original Message -----> From: <bobskc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> To: 
    <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 
    12:21 PM> Subject: [RT] AOL>>> > I felt that 
    a bottom may have been put in for AOL today and bought in at> > 
    20.33.  The 20M new shares was filled without effort and the low 
    volume> > leveled ... Warner is worth about $22 as a weighted mc 
    which means AOLis> > free and you get TW at a 10% 
    discount.  Just my thoughts and action..all> > due 
    diligence in order of course.> >> > 
    BobTo unsubscribe from this group, send an email 
    to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYour 
    use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A 
    href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>Yahoo! Terms of Service. 
    To 
  unsubscribe from this group, send an email 
  to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYour 
  use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A 
  href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>Yahoo! Terms of Service. 







Yahoo! Groups Sponsor


ADVERTISEMENT<a href="http://rd.yahoo.com/M=194081.1994012.3473453.1261774/D=egroupweb/S=1705001779:HM/A=1036972/R=0/*http://www.ediets.com/start.cfm?code=3466"targe
t=_top>









To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx





Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.