|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I vote NO mark brown
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
----- Original Message -----
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From:
<A title=cwwaring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
href="mailto:cwwaring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>ChasW
To: <A title=realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 4:56
AM
Subject: Re: [RT] List description:
interrogatories
If you asking for a vote, i vote for mark
brown----- Original Message -----From: "BobsKC" <<A
href="mailto:bobskc@xxxxxxxxxxxx";>bobskc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>To: <<A
href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>Sent:
Friday, April 05, 2002 2:21 AMSubject: Re: [RT] List description:
interrogatories> I respect your views Kent. It is
important for me to hear everyone's> thoughts. I said I would not
try to press my personal agenda on the list> and I meant that.
None the less, unless I see clear evidence to the> contrary, I will
continue to believe that courtesy is not a happenstance> trait but
rather a required commodity for any group of people our size. I>
also will need to see a clear majority who wish to have Mark Brown back
on> this list and I do not believe there is even a remote possibility
of that> happening. Whatever else we may or may not agree on, I
would hope you> agree that a group such as ours should make decisions
based on the> democratic concept of majority rules.>> As
to people selling things on the list, I addressed that in my post with>
suggestions for changes to our list description but you left
mysuggestions> for that part of the new description off your
post. There are some> commercial enterprise interests on our list
but as long as they don'ttroll> the list for customers, I don't
have a problem with that. I know of three> business owners on
here and they all contribute to the list. Business> owners are
people too and many if not all, on this list, are traders.>>
Your point about people making unnecessary short replies to the list
is> well taken but as you, yourself, pointed out, we have many newer
membersof> the trading/investing world who are likely new to
computers and mail lists> as well. The bandwidth for a txt email
is nearly nonexistent and removing> people for over-exuberance is
unlikely to happen.>> Again, I thank you for your input and hope
you will continue to express> your views which will always be given
respective attention.>> All best,>>
Bob>>>>>>> At 11:25 PM
4/4/2002 -0500, you wrote:>> > >Please keep posts to the
point and on the subject matter and refrainfrom> >
>unnecessary short reply posts like "thank you" type replies that use
up> > >valuable members' reading time.> >> >I
would like to see posting privs for people who violate this
rulesuspended> >just as much or more than I would like to see
people who occassionally> >attack others get booted off the
list. "Me toos" and "thank yous" takeup> >far more
bandwidth and are substantially worth less than some attacks.>
>> >> > >Also, please give each member's post the
respect it deserves, whetheror> > >not you agree with the
conclusions reached, and treat each other with> >
>professionalism and common decency. Personal attacks are not to be
madeon> > >this forum. Violators will be removed
immediately.> >> > >Posts advertising the sale of any
products or services of companies arenot> > >tolerated in
this forum. Members who post these kind of messages willbe> >
>removed immediately.> >> >This is the big area of
contention. What a lot of people don't know isthat> >some
people will post market calls or will make subtle references to some>
>magic method they use and then when people (mostly newbies) on the
list> >approach them privately, the poster will try to sell them
something.Many> >of you don't appreciate the fact that this is
what Mark Brown was tryingto> >expose. You all just get so
frosted that he made a personal attack. You> >never consider
the reason for the attack. Mark has shown me some of the>
>stuff that vendors ON THIS LIST tried to sell him when he contacted
them> >privately under an alias.> >> >And let's
consider the phrase "give each member's post the respect it>
>deserves". Does a post deserve respect just because a member of
thislist> >made it? I submit the answer is "No".
When someone posts "the marketwill> >go up and the market will
go down over the next few days", that is wholly> >deserving of
ridicule. Compare profitok's posts to Hohn Capello's.
Benis> >very specific, Capello is very vague. Membership
of this list can bebroken> >down into 2 categories: the
experienced and the inexperienced. I believe> >that when the
experienced members of this list take the time to ridicule>
>worthless posts, they are doing a service to the inexperienced.
Howabout> >you? They are also BENEFITTING all members of
the list because theobject> >of ridicule will consider his or
her posts more carefully. If the person> >being ridiculed is
actually a spammer pretending to make real marketcalls,> >that
person will be more likely to move on in search of more spammable>
>pastures. I don't know about you, but I would like to be on a list
where> >people who put REAL MONEY behind their trades are the on
people postingto> >the list. Not a list where anyone with
an email account tosses out> >completely hypothetical crap about
what the market may or may not do overa> >hypothetical
timeframe. How about you? I'm not interested in the
factthat> >Mars is up Uranus. I want to know what that
means for the market. How> >about you?> >>
>> > >New membership to the Realtraders forum is by invitation
only, with the> > >exception of existing members who are changing
email addresses.> >> >I would like Mark Brown to be
reinstated. And perhaps when he attacks> >someone, the more
sensitive members on the list could think about whetheror> >not
he has a point rather than just getting your panties in a wad.>
>> >> > >***Membership in Realtraders is open to
anyone who wishes to learn and> > >share information in a
professional environment where courtesy andrespect> > >of one
another is paramount.***> >> >I would like professionalism
to be paramount. Professionalism does notmean>
>politeness. The respect or lack of respect I get from this list has
zero> >effect on my ego. Zero. If I were to post some
crap and get hammeredfor> >it, I would reconsider the crap that
I posted, not whine to themoderator.> >And I would much rather
belong to a Real Traders list where Real Traders> >acted like
Klingons who just won the Soccer World Cup than I would liketo>
>belong to a list where faux traders treat each other with respect
and> >courtesy.> >> >If you had to be on a list
with Dic Migrains or Mark Browns, which wouldyou>
>choose?> >> >> >Kent> >>
>> >> >> >To unsubscribe from this group,
send an email to:> >realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> >> >Your use of Yahoo! Groups is
subject to <A
href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>>>>>
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:>
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>>> Your
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to <A
href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>>>To
unsubscribe from this group, send an email
to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYour
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A
href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
|