|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Enough already.
Both of you, please go play somewhere
else.
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
----- Original Message -----
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From:
<A title=sunsetisles@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
href="mailto:sunsetisles@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>sunsetisles2001
To: <A title=realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 5:45
PM
Subject: [RT] Re: Pedantry for you
and...
Ric,You are right! I have carefully read your
reply, and I must admitthat you are on to something. Whoops!l
Another mistake on my part.Rather,I must admit you are on
something.Pedantry is your lesser vocation.Change your address
to: <A
href="http://www.sanctimony.com";>http://www.sanctimony.comYOur
readers can then link to: <A
href="http://www.unctuous.net";>http://www.unctuous.net
or
http:/www.ingratiating.org ormost aptly: <A
href="http://www.verbalflatulence.com";>http://www.verbalflatulence.com or
the ultimate:<A
href="http://www.pontificating.bus";>http://www.pontificating.busHere's
wincing at
you.Stu
--- In realtraders@xxxx, ric ingram <ringram@xxxx>
wrote:> Hi "sunsetisles2001",> > On Date: Wed, 06 Feb
2002 16:55:08 -0000 you wrote:> > From: "sunsetisles2001"
<sunsetisles@xxxx>> Subject: Re: Confidence is (nearly)
all> > Please change your web site to: <A
href="http://www.pedantryrus.com/";>http://www.pedantryrus.com/>
> Thank you for your amusing and inventive comment.> >
Someone could grab that bit of cyber-space territory.> > I would
like to meet your expectations of me.> > So to be pedantic,
"sunsetisles2001", your isles seen to have the sun set > on them
last year.> > One of the assumptions you appear to be making is
that because you do not > value my email that all others feel the
same.> > If I have helped one person, my efforts are
worthwhile. What are you > giving back to the
trading community?> > You also appear to assume that I believe I
can reach everyone. I cannot > reach everyone, or
more accurately I believe I cannot reach > everyone.
See how I do try to meet your expectations of pedantry.> > Nor
can you reach everyone with any posting you make.> > None of us
can.> > As usual, it seems most of the positive responses are
sent privately, and > almost all the negative reactions are sent
publicly.> > Does this give you a hint as to a possible purpose
of those that publish > wholly negative emotional reactions in the
forum?> > If my message had no merit for you, and no relevance
for you, it would be > ignored - and correctly so. The
delete key that others have wisely spoken of.> > If the
message had value for you, you would digest and optionally write >
privately.> > If there was an area of confusion or disagreement
etcetera, you would ask > privately or in public, specifying your
query or disagreement or suggestion > or correction.>
> If the message hit a sore spot and caused emotional pain, to some
degree, > however small or large, then you might hit back
emotionally, in public, to > the forum.> > So
unfortunately for your apparent denial of your denial, the whole group
> now knows which of the above categories you appear to fall
within.> > Hope this is a wake-up call for you.> >
I have no illusions of being able to help more than a subset of the forums
> members. As I said in my original email, twenty
years ago if someone > gave me the ideas about confidence, it would
have been wasted on > me. Perhaps even ten years ago I
would have reacted emotionally to the > confidence ideas and been
in denial of the source of the reaction.> > As always we have to
give permission to be upset. While some see no >
purpose, some find use in the message for their current situation, some
see > it as obvious and assume others do too. Some
will take it personally and > others will be upset in a
non-specific manner.> > All these responses/reactions are more a
function of the reader and his/her > developmental stage than what
is actually written or indeed how it is written.> >
Reactions are as much or more about us - as they are about that which we
> react to.> > From my personal experience and
those of my coaching clients, to trade > successfully, most, if not
all traders seem to need to understand this > truth of human
behaviour and get past it. Otherwise we will always be
> victims of our reactions to external events.> >
Successful traders are exploiters of external events, not victims.>
> May you be an exploiter not a victim.> > Paradoxically,
exploiters seem to be mostly providers of service and > victims are
most often seekers of service in the market.> > Now you know one
of the purposes of my emails - to open up perceptions to > help
spur you on your own individual path to trading
success. And every > path is different, and
yet has many common features.> > I am truly sorry that your
perceptions seem to be mostly closed at this >
time. This is obviously right for you at this time and I
respect > this. They will open when you are ready.>
> Accept that others are at different stages of their perceptions
being > opened and at different stages on their different
paths.> > Your perceptions and stage is not others perceptions
and stage.> > Unconditional regards, Ric.>
www.traderscalm.comTo
unsubscribe from this group, send an email
to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYour
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A
href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>Yahoo! Terms of Service.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
|