PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<IFRAME frameBorder=0 height=60
hspace=2 marginHeight=0 marginWidth=0 scrolling=no
src="http://knight.economist.com/html.ng/site=econ&size=468x60&adsection=business&media=print&pagepos=1"
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #000066" vspace=2 width=468 BORDERCOLOR="000066"
allowTransparency="true">
<IMG alt="" height=2 hspace=0
src="http://www.economist.com/images/blocks/spacer.gif"
width=125><IMG
alt=Economist.com border=0 height=34
src="http://www.economist.com/images/ecdc_125x34.gif" vspace=3
width=125>
<IMG alt="" height=1
src="http://www.economist.com/images/blocks/spacer.gif" width=17>
<IMG alt="" height=1
src="http://www.economist.com/images/blocks/spacer.gif" width=1>
<IMG alt="" height=2 hspace=0
src="http://www.economist.com/images/blocks/spacer.gif"
width=326><IMG alt="" height=34
src="http://www.economist.com/images/pagehead/FinanceandEconomics.gif"
vspace=3 width=326>
<IMG alt="" height=1
src="http://www.economist.com/images/blocks/spacer.gif" width=120>
<IMG alt="" height=1
src="http://www.economist.com/images/blocks/spacer.gif"
width=126>
<IMG alt="" height=1
src="http://www.economist.com/images/blocks/spacer.gif"
width=5>
<IMG alt="" height=1
src="http://www.economist.com/images/blocks/black.gif"
width=600><FONT color=#cc0033
face="verdana, geneva, arial, sans serif" size=-1>Celestial
investing <FONT face="verdana, geneva, arial, sans serif"
size=+1>What a little moonlight can do<FONT color=#999999
face="verdana,geneva,arial,sans serif" size=-2>
Oct 18th 2001 From The Economist print
edition<FONT face="verdana,geneva,arial,sans serif"
size=-1>How the sun and the moon move markets
WHEN ace traders call
themselves “Masters of the Universe”, they speak truer than they know. There is
a growing, heavenly body of evidence that share prices are influenced by forces
from outer space—well, the sun and the moon, anyway. Master these
inter-planetary forces, and you master the markets.
Seven souls have boldly
gone where no economists have gone before, producing no fewer than three new
papers quantifying extra-terrestrial influences at work in world stockmarkets.
David Hirshleifer, of Ohio State University, and Tyler Shumway, of the
University of Michigan, have taken a long look at the sun. Across 26
stockmarkets, in 1982-97, they found that, on days with more sunshine in the
morning than usual, shares generated above-average gains, and lower gains on
unusually cloudy days. After taking sunshine into account, other weather
conditions such as snow or rain turned out to have no impact on share
returns.
The effect of the sun
seems to have been quite big. For shares traded in New York, for instance,
annualised returns on perfectly sunny days averaged 24.8%, compared with 8.7% on
perfectly cloudy days. Moreover, unlike some stockmarket “anomalies” discovered
by economists, investing by the sun would have been more profitable than simply
investing in the market index, even after subtracting trading costs. Alas, this
does not guarantee profitable trading in the future. Even assuming the effect
really exists, investors, now they have been alerted to it, will probably
arbitrage away any excess returns to be had by exploiting it.
The other two papers,
both published by the University of Michigan, look a little closer to home, at
the moon. Kathy Yuan, Lu Zheng and Qiaoqiao Zhu examined share returns in 48
countries until the end of July 2001, from start dates as far back as 1965. They
found that, on average, daily returns were much higher around new moons than
full moons, when investors are presumably sprouting fangs and howling rather
than buying shares. Returns were 8.3% lower in weeks with a full moon than ones
with a new moon. The lunar effect held in 43 of the 48 countries, and investing
by it would have been profitable even after trading costs.
Ilia Dichev and Troy
Janes reach a similar conclusion from a study of 100 years of American share
prices, and at least 15 years' data in each of 24 other countries. Daily returns
around new moons were roughly double those around full moons. The lunar effect
is strongest outside America. All seven economists insist that their results are
not the product of data-mining—crunching the numbers in search of any
interesting pattern they can find. Rather, the results are the latest
manifestation of behavioural finance, which seeks to show how psychological
patterns explain apparent market inefficiencies.
Still, although it is
widely believed that the phases of the moon affect behaviour, psychologists have
yet convincingly to prove it. The behavioural economists reckon this may be
because psychologists have focused on trying to link the moon to extreme
behavioural problems in a few disturbed people, rather than to more humdrum
lunacies affecting humanity as a whole, including a bias against shares around
full moons.
There is, on the other
hand, stronger scientific evidence that sunshine puts people in a better mood,
as well as making them more credulous. You will find that, even as you reach for
your diary for the next new moon, the sun is surely shining. <BR
clear=all>
<IMG height=1
src="http://www.economist.com/images/Spacer.gif" width=740>
<IMG height=5
src="http://www.economist.com/images/Spacer.gif" width=740>
<FONT color=black
face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size=-2>Copyright © 2001 The
Economist Newspaper and The Economist Group. All rights
reserved.
<IMG height=2
src="http://www.economist.com/images/Spacer.gif" width=740>
<IMG height=1
src="http://www.economist.com/images/Spacer.gif"
width=740>
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Attachment:
Description: ""
Attachment:
Description: ""
Attachment:
Description: ""
Attachment:
Description: ""
Attachment:
Description: ""
|