|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I believe it was late Summer/Early Fall when it happened.. I lived in
Anchorage at the time and we were in shock seeing the black smoke come from
Elmendorf runway... obviously no survivors.... I don't know how long it
takes to make (replace) those.... I know they cost a pretty penny........
soooooooooo... anyway... at the time I had heard that we had two in USA so
don't know if that is true.. we may have more by now... but would make sense
if they have not replaced that one during Clinton admin that would explain
need ....AT least we are getting something for the U.N and Nato dues we
pay....???
----- Original Message -----
From: "BobR" <bobrabcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 2:13 PM
Subject: Re: [RT] Bull to Bear - Another Bush Appearance..... PPT at work
> What a strategy, aren't the geese headed south now? Never thought I'd be
> terrorized by geese other than droppings.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dorothy K. Carter" <dorothy.carter@xxxxxxxx>
> To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 11:04 AM
> Subject: Re: [RT] Bull to Bear - Another Bush Appearance..... PPT at work
>
>
> > MY guess is we've rec'd some serious threats to the homefront... so they
> > have decided to get the AWAX here to patrol... I'm glad they are
here.....
> > remember one of USA AWAX planes crashed in Alaska about 2-3 yrs ago
> when
> > Canadian Geese were sucked into the turbine engines........
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Earl Adamy" <eadamy@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 1:59 PM
> > Subject: Re: [RT] Bull to Bear - Another Bush Appearance..... PPT at
work
> >
> >
> > > Ya gotta love NATO ... sending planes on the risky mission of
patrolling
> > US
> > > airspace instead of the safe mission of patrolling Afghanistan!
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Dorothy K. Carter" <dorothy.carter@xxxxxxxx>
> > > To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 11:54 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [RT] Bull to Bear - Another Bush Appearance..... PPT at
> work
> > >
> > >
> > > > Well there's Bush's 2nd appearance today and the mkt is not rallying
> to
> > > new
> > > > highs... maybe time is up?... He's been the man for over a week...
> > > everytime
> > > > they marched him to the Rose Garden you'de been squeezed if you
were
> > > > short.. hee hee
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Ralph Volpe" <rjv@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 1:46 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [RT] Bull to Bear
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Earl, I agree with certain parts of your post but I question the
> > pattern
> > > > analysis. First, you are absolutely correct about the buyers not
> > > > > allowing the sellers to overwhelm them. However, I think that's
more
> > of
> > > a
> > > > sublime seller technique to entice the bulls in, no different then
> > > > > gently tugging the bait to get the fish to bite. As Dorothy argued
> > > several
> > > > days ago, if this is a bull reversal, then where's the volume. This
> > > > > rally really lacks enthusiasm, especially after the sharp drops
that
> > > > occurred. You would think there'd be a lot more enthusiasm to bottom
> > fish.
> > > > >
> > > > > As for the bull flag, I can argue it's a pennant, but that may be
> more
> > > > semantics or a trader's preference. If it's a pennant, then today is
a
> > > > > break, but I think this will fail and lead to prices below the
> > > formation.
> > > > If that happens, then my bull to bear conversion is on target, but
we
> > > > > have to see. Also, a flag or pennant is arguable and can be
defined
> as
> > a
> > > > forth wave correction in a five-wave corrective pattern that's
> > > > > countering the WTC drop --- and today is the final fifth wave
higher
> > in
> > > > that corrective pattern. If there isn't significant follow-through
> > > > > after today , this move is doomed.
> > > > >
> > > > > Ralph
> > > > >
> > > > > Earl Adamy wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > A bull flag should project at least 62% expansion of the first
leg
> > > from
> > > > the
> > > > > > retracement low or 1147+-. Like you, I am very dubious about
this
> > > market
> > > > but
> > > > > > if that's a bull flag, it's bullish especially in combination
with
> > the
> > > > > > outside reversal and taking out of two inside days so far. The
> > > critical
> > > > part
> > > > > > is what happens if/when it gets back to the high because it's
not
> a
> > > bull
> > > > > > flag without a significant move above 1087.50. The only
> significance
> > > of
> > > > the
> > > > > > retracement levels is to show that the retracement has been <
25%.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > My trading timing is suffering from 3+ weeks off so take it with
a
> > > grain
> > > > of
> > > > > > salt. One thing I have noticed most of the way up is that the
> emini
> > > > sellers
> > > > > > (ask size) have tried repeatedly to overwhelm the buyers but the
> > > buyers
> > > > keep
> > > > > > absorbing inventory and moving it up. The other thing which I
> > noticed
> > > > was
> > > > > > the unusual configuration of the reversal out of the triangle
> > > formation
> > > > > > discussed here yesterday. From what I hear a) there were big
> orders
> > in
> > > > the
> > > > > > spoo pit this morning at the lows which drove the futures up
> driving
> > > the
> > > > > > cash up in turn and b) the ESF (Exchange Stabilization Fund) is
> > being
> > > > used
> > > > > > to <interfere with> <support> <manipulate> the market (take your
> > > pick).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Earl
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > > > realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > > realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|