[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RT] NASDAQ-100



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links


That would be one way.  I was wondering about 
weighting them or maybe just making a digital kind of thingy where up is a +1 
and down is a -1 and then add the +1's and -1's.
 
bobr
 
<BLOCKQUOTE 
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  <DIV 
  style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From: 
  Clyde Lee 
  
  To: <A title=realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  
  Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 10:39 
  AM
  Subject: Re: [RT] NASDAQ-100
  
  If you have tradestation just put them in as 
  Data2 thru Data7 and make an indicator
  which is   c[1]+c[2]+......
   
  and display .
  <BLOCKQUOTE 
  style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    <DIV 
    style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From: 
    <A title=bobrabcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    href="mailto:bobrabcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>BobR 
    To: <A 
    title=realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    
    Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 12:27 
    PM
    Subject: Re: [RT] NASDAQ-100
    Now then, what would be the best way to combine these 6 
    into a custom index?----- Original Message -----From: "Stan 
    Book" <<A 
    href="mailto:sbook@xxxxxxxxxxx";>sbook@xxxxxxxxxxx>To: <<A 
    href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>Sent: 
    Thursday, October 04, 2001 9:45 AMSubject: RE: [RT] 
    NASDAQ-100> Thanks to Don for the link to weighting 
    factors.>> Looks like six stocks account for more than 1/3 of 
    the index (34.33%).> 12.22 - MSFT +* 63**> 5.87 - INTC + 
    59> 4.82 - QCOM + 55> 4.28 - CSCO + 42> 3.72 - ORCL + 
    30> 3.42 - AMGN + 64>> * divergence of Cumulative Net 
    Volume from price: + is positive divergence> and - is 
    negative.> ** number of days out of the last 100 market days that the 
    21 day EMA ofNet> Effective Volume has been positive. In theory, 
    this is a measure of "smart> money" accumulation. Over time, the 
    highest ranked stocks outperform the> lowest ranked 
    stocks.>> Stan>>>> -----Original 
    Message-----> From: BobR [mailto:bobrabcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]> 
    Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 7:33 AM> To: 
    realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [RT] 
    NASDAQ-100>>> That is a very interesting post, 
    Stan.  Do you know which of the NDXstocks> are the most 
    influential in the index movement, perhaps the top 6 or so?> Can you 
    make a hierachy screening of the components of the index from most> 
    influential to least?>> thanks,> bobr>> 
    ----- Original Message -----> From: "Stan Book" 
    <sbook@xxxxxxxxxxx>> To: 
    <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 
    2001 9:37 PM> Subject: [RT] NASDAQ-100>>> > 
    Just scanned the NASDAQ-100 stocks. There are many more examples of> 
    positive> > than negative accumulation line divergence's. This 
    suggests an> intermediate> > term bottoming process may 
    have begun.> >> > In terms of cycles, we are within the 
    time frame of a 3,6 & 9 month low> (the> > 
    corresponding 12 month low was overwhelmed). We also have reasonable> 
    > symmetry with the October 1998 low. No guarantees, of course.> 
    >> > While short sell candidates are few and far between, a 
    good rally could> > change that. The best short candidate I find 
    is BBBY. The stock isbumping> > up against potential 
    resistance with evidence of distribution. This is> often> > 
    a low risk short sell setup.> >> > Especially for NW is 
    bottom fishing candidate, LLTC. This stock has gone> to> > 
    new lows with evidence of accumulation which suggests a potential 
    trend> > change. LLTV has the largest divergence of price to 
    accumulation line of> all> > NASDAQ-100 stocks. I would be 
    happy with a rally followed by a pullbackto> a> > 
    double bottom with evidence of continued accumulation. This 
    wouldnormally> > present a low risk intermediate term buy set 
    up.> >> > Other NASDAQ-100 stocks that show strong 
    accumulation are:> > BGEN - higher 10 week low> > CEFT - 
    higher 6 & 9 month low> > IMNX - 6 month high> > 
    MEDI - 6 month double bottom (slightly higher low)> >> > 
    NASDAQ-100 stocks that show strong distribution have lost more than 
    90%of> > their value over the past 100 trading days. They have 
    virtually allbecome> > penny stocks.> >> > 
    No recommendations, just some observations.> >> > 
    Stan> >> >> >> >> > To 
    unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:> > 
    realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> 
    >> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to<A 
    href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> 
    >> >>>>> To unsubscribe from this 
    group, send an email to:> 
    realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>>> Your 
    use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to <A 
    href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>>>>> 
    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:> 
    realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>>> Your 
    use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to <A 
    href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>>To 
    unsubscribe from this group, send an email 
    to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYour 
    use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A 
    href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>Yahoo! Terms of Service. 
    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email 
  to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYour 
  use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A 
  href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>Yahoo! Terms of Service. 




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx





Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.