|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Its Don not Ben.
SPC Is the S&P 500 cash
Here are monthly charts with counts, the first with the "normal count"
(numbers in blue curcles) and the 5/35 oscillator. If you understand AGET
the 5/35 has lost "control" since the wave 4 depth below the zero lined
exceeds 40% of the wave 3 oscillator height.
That bring us to the monthly chart with long term count and the 10/70
oscillator which has not reached zero (needed to identify a wave 4 low).
The counts always place the largest part (height) of the oscillator as the
wave 3. If you desire more information go to www.tradingtech.com and
download the demo. It is very informative on how counts are generated vs
your comments?
If you have the time to look at the previous charts posted you will see each
one folds into the next. I included starting dates of each chart and then
referrenced them on the chart of the next larger degree so that you can see
what each represents in large schemes of things. Like I said they all fold
together for the moment.
Hope this helps you see the picture which continues to unfold.
don ewers
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ralph Volpe" <rjv@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 10:48 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: [RT] SPC Wave Counts
> Ben, I just looked at the charts you sent but I haven't had a chance to
analyze
> what they signify. Since I'm not too familiar with the AGET format it will
take
> me some time. However, if you have a monthly chart of the same vehicle (I
don't
> know what SPC is) I would appreciate seeing it. By the way, is SPC the
S&P500?
> What I did notice, however, is a strange method they use to generate their
> Elliot counts. For example, I see large waves without counts while smaller
waves
> have counts. It seemed like the program was rushing to arrive at something
and
> just grabbed any to and fro movement and made them some Elliot division,
then
> when a good turning point came along the program didn't go back to
redesignate
> the previous waves as subwaves. As I said, I have to study it more, but a
good
> long-term chart will help to solidify the major waves, which I'm still
puzzled
> over.
>
> Ralph
>
> Don Ewers wrote:
>
> > Ben, Ralph, I am not sure how much clearer a post below could have been,
but
> > for the moment they "are" all folding into eachother? Each time frame
> > represents a sub count of the next. No Hodini is required just an open
mind
> > perhaps?
> > don ewers
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Ralph Volpe" <rjv@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 10:40 PM
> > Subject: Re: [RT] S&P Longterm
> >
> > > Ben, I didn't realize that AGET did that. Are you sure the counts
you're
> > > viewing aren't sub waves to larger waves? I don't use AGET, but my
> > > problem with studying charts of different time frames and formats is
> > > also to get a conclusive agreement to satisfy them all, but it mostly
> > > takes Hodini to do it.
> > >
> > > Ralph
> > >
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
FREE COLLEGE MONEY
CLICK HERE to search
600,000 scholarships!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Pv4pGD/4m7CAA/ySSFAA/zMEolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Attachment:
Description: "SPCmonth092801LongTerm.gif"
Attachment:
Description: "SPCmonth092801Normal.gif"
|