|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
----- Original Message -----
From: "ztrader" <ztrader@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 5:25 PM
Subject: Re: [RT] Best S&P cycles
> On Thursday, May 24, 2001, 1:23:57 PM, DH wrote:
>
> D> The actual cycle period is slightly longer, up to a day, than the
> D> charted period, due to the detection method - a mechanical trading
> D> system I cooked up for the test.
NW: So, one of the significant cycles is about 10 trading days which is
about 1/2 the Lunar cycle?
Good thing you are ignoring that one.
Cheers,
Norman
>
> Interesting. How does it compare with conventional spectral analysis
> over the test period? If different, what accounts for the difference?
>
> Is your code different from the 'cycle detector' (a trading system)
> that came with (older?) versions of TS?
>
> D> Those with an aversion to statistics, and scientific methods in
> D> general, please delete this
>
> Naaahh - I'll keep it. :-) Nice work!
>
> ztrader
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|