[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re[2]: [RT] Mark Brown & RT Rules



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links


----- Original Message -----
From: "David Neeran" <dneeran@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 3:21 AM
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [RT] Mark Brown & RT Rules


> I am sure I am not the only one who has noticed your pointed and not so
> subtle attacks on Mark Brown, now that he isn;t here to reply.
> You weren't so bold when MB was here to defend and retaliate.
> AFAIC, you're no Mark Brown. He is a better trader than you, any day.
>
> Go ahead, ban me too.

Howdy David,

  Few have ever said I was subtle. Thanks for the compliment and for saying
I wasn't comparable to Mark Brown. . As for my alledged attacks on anyone on
this list, if you think that is the case, your are free to forward them to
the moderator and see if I have broken any rules.  As for your posts or
anyone's, although I may not agree with what you post, as long as you adhere
to the rules,
I hope you continue to post.

  As for making Mark Brown into some kind of trading legend. if someone will
post his fabulous market forecasts, we can see the empirical proof.

Thanks,

Norman


>
>
> >From: "Norman Winski" <nwinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Reply-To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Subject: Re: Re[2]: [RT] Mark Brown & RT Rules
> >Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 22:44:50 -0400
> >
> >Z,
> >
> >   Why not post some of MB's classic forecasts so we can see how they
come
> >out? How about,
> >the best of MB or Research Dept?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Norman
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "ztrader" <ztrader@xxxxxxxxx>
> >To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 10:41 PM
> >Subject: Re[2]: [RT] Mark Brown & RT Rules
> >
> >
> > > On Monday, May 21, 2001, 7:16:31 PM, Randall Kurzon wrote:
> > >
> > > RK> Mark has posted his trades and trade ideas well in advance and far
> > > RK> more often than any astro new-comer.
> > >
> > > Puullleeezzzeee don't get the astro/systems thing going again. In
> > > watching many lists for many years, I'd say this is probably the
> > > LEADING cause of contentious posts. There is a huge gap between the
> > > 'believer' and the 'stat' camps, as we have just seen recently. I
> > > persisted, one more time, in trying to bridge the gap, but, one more
> > > time, it did not work. I declare it impossible - and I challenge
> > > anyone to bridge the gap to the satisfaction of both sides. :-)
> > >
> > > RK> Guess I'll be kicked off too now for speaking my mind!
> > >
> > > Oops. :-)
> > >
> > > ztrader
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> >http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/