|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
No, but he posted his analysis and strategy thoroughly BEFORE the trade. I
find that a lot more plausible then someone who says "ya well I bought two
weeks ago". Plus he beat the hell out of what I did today (nothing). Just
credit where its due. BTW I don't know this Haytham guy from Adam, before
this list, but hes got my full attention now.
----- Original Message -----
From: Tom Alexander <gta3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 7:02 PM
Subject: Re: [RT] Mark Brown & RT Rules
> Really? Did he post his statements?
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Joe Duffy <joeduffy@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 6:55 PM
> Subject: Re: [RT] Mark Brown & RT Rules
>
>
> > I would like to see Mark back too. I think he should post some monthly
> > statements as an admission fee. The guy he relentlessly criticized just
> made
> > another 125 points in his ndx trade today. The latter is likely a "real"
> > trader.
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <I4Lothian@xxxxxxx>
> > To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 6:49 PM
> > Subject: [RT] Mark Brown & RT Rules
> >
> >
> > > I would like to argue that the policy of banishment for certain type
of
> > > policy violations is a bit extreme. Yes, we all value civil
> discussions.
> > > But I can tell you from working in this industry that civility
sometimes
> > goes
> > > out the window during some of the most interesting and heated
> discussions.
> > >
> > > Passion can lead to incredible creativity and original thought, as
well
> as
> > > ugly moments and unfortunate choices of words. Sometimes we just need
> to
> > > cool down and I would suggest that a 1 week or 2 week cool down period
> for
> > > violations of the language or conduct violations would be a much
fairer
> > > punishment.
> > >
> > > Kicking Mark Brown off of real-traders for language violations or even
> for
> > > being a pain in the ASS (emphasis added for effect) on occasion is a
> > > shortsighted policy for someone who has contributed as much original
> > thought
> > > and thought provoking posts as he has.
> > >
> > > Sure, there are some that do not like him. There are those who don't
> like
> > me
> > > either. Big Deal. I am not here to be liked, or liked by all, but
> rather
> > to
> > > learn and to share.
> > >
> > > Personally, I like seeing people's ideas challenged. When people
> > challenge
> > > my ideas, that only makes me and the ideas stronger. Mark challenges
> > people.
> > >
> > > I challenge the moderator(s) or list owners of this list to change
their
> > > rules and allow greater freedom of expression and to establish cooling
> > down
> > > periods rather than banishment. Lighten up a little, or you will
end
> up
> > > making this a less interesting and useful forum for sharing
information
> > and
> > > ideas.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > John J. Lothian
> > >
> > > Disclosure: Futures trading involves financial risk, lots of it!
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|