|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
--- In realtraders@xxxx, chrischeatham@xxxx wrote:
> In my experience, fib retracements usually, but not always, are
> better log. For Andrews channels the way I use them, linear is
> usually better, but I try both and pick the best for the market.
For
> instance, I maintain monthly fx charts with Andrews-type analysis;
> most are linear, but some are log and for a couple there is
> sufficient value that I maintain both. I don't use Gann/speed
> resistance angles, but when I used to, I think the answer would
have
> been the same as for Andrews. Some things are no brainer log --
> high volatility stocks -- fib and andrews work beautifully log. I
> would have thought the same for volatile commodity markets like NG,
> but to me the evidence is less clear there.
>
> Another thing on this topic -- log indicators. if you use
indicators
> like momentum or macd, you might want to try log versions where log
> scale makes sense -- especially if you watch divergences. Log
scale
> macd for instance will reveal divergences in an up market that
> regular will not see. Going down, the opposite is true, linear
will
> show divergences that are not there on log. If anyone is
interested,
> I'd be happy to post my log Macd code.
>
> Chris
>
>
Chris,
It is very interesting what you've said, can you show us an example
of what you said?.
Thanks,
Haytham
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|