[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Fwd: Re: [RT] Re: Fibo Research



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

>Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 11:27:50 -0700
>To: "Joe Duffy" <joeduffy@xxxxxxxxx>
>From: Eliot Kaplan <eliot@xxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: [RT] Re: Fibo Research
>Cc:
>Bcc:
>X-Attachments:
>
>
>RTs,
>
>Don't know why I'm bothering to write this.
>
>I agree with both Joe and Neal. Yes of course Neal works with Joe 
>DINapoli, but that doesn't mean the post is insincere, and for me 
>doesn't approach spam.
>
>And in as much as I am familiar with the things he wrote about, I 
>still found the post well written, and honest.
>
>Mark is entertaining though, and I don't doubt his abilities either. 
>And, it seems, he needs not only his well earned trading profits, 
>but an emotional outlet like the list. Psychoanalysis is expensive 
>these days after all. <G>.
>
>Who am I? No one in particular. And not even particularly successful 
>as yet. Still learning from all.
>
>Eliot
>
>>This was an excellent post. As such I better jump in now, before those who
>>can't trade start criticizing those who do trade. Neal, nice job.
>>
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: Neal Hughes <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 1:41 PM
>>Subject: Re: [RT] Re: Fibo Research
>>
>>
>>>
>>>  List members,
>>>
>>>  Fibs are a lot of fun, and can be very accurate and consistent. But
>>>  not on their own! You can't just blindly trade Fibs, you need to
>>>  combine some lagging indicators..
>>>
>>>  Fibonacci gives you a look into the future. They tell you where
>>>  future support and resistance is, BEFORE price gets there. This
>>>  is very powerful. But to the novice, it is very dangerous too. Novices
>>>  are usually wishing for a magical indicator that will easily tell them
>>>  when to get in and out.. Hehehe..
>>>
>>>  As with ANY trading tool, you will find they work sometimes, but
>>>  not others. How do you decide when to believe them?
>>>
>>>  After years of studying and applying, I can say that this is a
>>>  learnable skill and that you can become very good at it. But don't
>>>  expect a computer to figure it out and make decisions for you.
>>>
>>>  It would take a lot of explaining, but here are some pointers:
>>>  1) Trade only with the trend, OR with a good directional pattern.
>>>  (directional patterns can over-rule trend, actually predict a change
>>>  of trend before it happens).
>>>  2) Get good at watching the MACD and Stochastic in different
>>>  time-frames. This will tell you exactly which fib level is most
>>>  likely to turn price.
>>>  3) Give preference to trades which put your entry or stop in
>>>  an area of Confluence or Agreement (some people call this
>>>  clustering).
>>>  4) Employ entry techniques which reduce the need for you
>>>  to guess! Enter when a Fib level is actually supporting
>>>  or resisting, not before. This is not essential, but is highly
>>>  recommended for those who are learning Fibonacci techniques.
>>>
>>>  There are more advanced techniques to make your win-loss ratio
>>>  really impressive, but you're not going to learn all of those via email..
>>>  The above is a good start. With some study and experience you
>>>  can boost your performance with Fibonacci techniques.
>>>
>>>  Years ago I did a web-based survey, asking traders why Fibonacci
>>>  techniques work.. The results were interesting.. What is important,
>>>  is that they work.
>>>
>>>  -Neal.
>>>
>>>
>>>  At 03:13 PM 5/16/2001 +0000, you wrote:
>>>  >To me, there are two practical problems with fib #s on their own: 1)
>>>  >lack of consistent precision -- people still put stops just beyond
>>>  >them, tempting the boys to run them when they can.  So while they are
>>>  >sometimes precise enough to be useful, it isn't consistent.  Also,
>>>  >there are times when log scale works and times when lin does. 2) How
>>>  >do you decide which fib # is going to work?  Sometimes clusters help,
>>  > >but not consistently.
>>  > >
>>  > >I have come to respect angular geometry techniques like Andrews more
>>  > >than fib for turning points. Much more precise.  Amazingly, there is
>>>  >usually an Andrews reason for those turns just above, just below, or
>>>  >nowhere near fib #s.  I still look at fibs, but as a secondary
>>  > >consideration.
>>>  >
>>>  >I don't know how this could ever be tested other than manually
>>>  >though, not in TS anyway.  The code for the best fit for Andrews
>>  > >would be pretty darn big.
>>>  >
>>>  >Chris
>>>  >
>>>  >
>>>  >--- In realtraders@xxxx, "Dan Harels" <harelsdb@xxxx> wrote:
>>>  > > This is directed to Research, however, I encourage others with
>>>  >insights to
>>>  > > reply.
>>>  > >
>>>  > > In a previous post, Research indicated that he is fond of figuring
>>>  >things
>>>  > > out and that a good share of his trading profits go towards
>>>  >computational
>>>  > > power.  Mr. Research has established his credibility in my mind and
>>>  >I am
>>>  > > curious if he has performed any studies related to the statistical
>>>  >validity,
>>>  > > from a trading point of view, of Fibonacci retracements and
>>>  >expansions.  Any
>>>  > > information he cares to share on this subject will be appreciated.
>>>  > >
>>>  > > Thanks,
>>>  > >
>>>  > > Dan
>>>  > >
>>>  > > _________________________________________________________________
>>>  > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>>>  >
>>>  >
>>>  >To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>>>  >realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>  >
>>>  >
>>>  >
>>>  >Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>>>  realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>>realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>>
>>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>--
>
>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>Eliot Kaplan
>20211 Croydon Lane
>Topanga, CA 90290
>Voice: 310.455.3810
>Fax: 310.455.3085
>email; eliot@xxxxxxx
>web: www.isu.com


-- 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Eliot Kaplan
20211 Croydon Lane
Topanga, CA 90290
Voice: 310.455.3810
Fax: 310.455.3085
email; eliot@xxxxxxx
web: www.isu.com


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/