|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
"Measured move" is the concept I once posted on this list as the Digital
Technical Indicator whereby I described how to take one's index finger and
thumb, placing them the distance of a swing on a market chart, and then
using this measure of your finger and thumb to project a similar move. I
said this was one of the most powerful technical methods I knew. As a
result, I received several inquires as to where the inquiree could procure
the DTI software. <G>
Hopefully, I have described this concept and simulataneously provided some
entertainment.
Cheers,
Norman
----- Original Message -----
From: <H.Albizem@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 5:13 PM
Subject: [RT] Re: Price Projection Methods
> --- In realtraders@xxxx, robert@xxxx wrote:
> > Haytham,
> >
> > Thank you for your insight.
> >
> > Can you elaborate a little on what is a measured move & where can I
> > read about it more?
>
> HA:I am going to update my gif snap picture software today or
> tomorrow, I need to post a chart then hand drawing explain on it what
> is measured move. My current software doesnot have the capability of
> editing snap picture now.
> >
> > I agree the wave count no doubt is very subjective but then how do
> > you use elliott leaving the wave count out?
>
> I use elliot time and price projection and see if it fit the BIG
> PICTURE I am getting to using other methods.
> >
> > Which method of Gann do you find most useful for price projection?
>
> HA: All of them, there is no "perfect" method, but when you combine
> them effectively, it become "very powerful" :-)
> >
> > I would also like to read your previous posts on Gann angles &
> mirror
> > image if you can remember aproximate dates or message numbers.
>
> HA: Angles : message # 4673,7496
> Mirror Image: message # 4530,4542
> >
> > I do appreciate your kind help.
>
> HA: You are welcomed.
> >
> > Robert
> >
> > --- In realtraders@xxxx, H.Albizem@xxxx wrote:
> > > --- In realtraders@xxxx, robert@xxxx wrote:
> > > > ---
> > > > Lenny & Haytham,
> > > >
> > > > What are your experiences using the 100% & 161.8% of the
> previous
> > > > swing as the next price objective?
> > >
> > > HA: I look at it but it will not be the deciding factor, the
> > deciding
> > > factor is the measured move.
> > > > Do you find the Andrew Cardwell method has a better accuracy?
> > >
> > > HA:I never used it in my analysis.
> > > >
> > > > Do you remember the message numbers or dates of your previous
> > posts
> > > > on this methodology?
> > >
> > > HA: I am not sure which message you are looking for, I have
> > commented
> > > on NASDAQ using different methods such as SQ of 9, other squares,
> > > angle, mirror image...etc
> > > > Haytham,
> > > >
> > > > Is your method different and more effective than above two and
> > > would
> > > > you be willing to discuss it (Not divulge it if proprietory) or
> > > point
> > > > to the resources (books, sites etc.) where one can research
> them?
> > >
> > > HA:I don't claim any method to my self but I am taking some laws
> > and
> > > principles to another dimension, Gann methods are the fundemental
> > of
> > > my analysis, I use elliot principles(without wave count because
> it
> > is
> > > so subjective and I look only on hard evidence and data),
> important
> > > thing I want to mention numbers by it self are live and
> > harmonic.Some
> > > of the recources: Michael Jenkins 2 books as a start in the field
> > of
> > > geometry. I will refer you to Norman Winski on this list for Gann
> > > reading list, I found him to be very helpfull. Also I studied the
> > > astro work of Langham, Jensin, Mikula, Meridian,Walker(Super
> Timing
> > > Techniques) and currently indulged in Bayer work.
> > >
> > > > Would also like feed back from other members on the list.
> > > >
> > > > Would appreciate any input.
> > > >
> > > > Thank you all,
> > > > Robert
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > In realtraders@xxxx, H.Albizem@xxxx wrote:
> > > > > --- In realtraders@xxxx, rosow@xxxx wrote:
> > > > > > Haytham,
> > > > > > I have posted in the past regarding Cardwell's
> Positive
> > &
> > > > > Negative
> > > > > > Reversals. Here's an example of a Negative Reversal. They
> > show
> > > up
> > > > > when an
> > > > > > oscillator such as the RSI has a higher peak high at the
> same
> > > > time
> > > > > the price
> > > > > > moves to a lower peak high. This was developed by Andrew
> > > Cardwell
> > > > > to use in
> > > > > > price forecasting. You label (3) oscillator pivots, (2)
> > > > oscillator
> > > > > highs (A&
> > > > > > B) and the lowest oscillator low between points A&B (C).
> The
> > > > > Negative
> > > > > > Reversal price projection formula from B goes as follows:
> C -
> > > (A-
> > > > B)
> > > > > = Price
> > > > > > projection/target. The price data associated with
> oscillator
> > > > points
> > > > > A, B & C
> > > > > > are the #'s you throw into the above formula. I have
> attached
> > a
> > > > > Bean chart
> > > > > > with (3) examples of Negative Reversals. I only posted
> > details
> > > of
> > > > > the first
> > > > > > target but you'll get the drift.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Lenny
> > > > >
> > > > > Lenny,
> > > > >
> > > > > I like RSI and I keep it on my charts always, I like the new
> > RSI
> > > > > method and I have tested 1 year ago, it work fine but I
> > currently
> > > I
> > > > > am not using RSI for price projection and divergence because
> of
> > > > other
> > > > > methods I am using. Thanks for the info.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Haytham
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|