|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
(this is a resend - it looks as if the RT/yahoogroups server was down
last night.)
Chuck's note regarding detecting a V-shaped bottom got me wondering how
often that sort of thing comes up in practice. The answer is suspected
is "not often", but it also depends upon how such things are measured.
Using NDX 100 data going back to 1990 (all I have), I defined a V-bottom
as one where a given low bar is -20% less than the highest high in the
prior 15 bars and -20% less than the highest high in the next 15 bars. I
whipped together a quick Tradestation "custom paint bar" study, which
marks a bar in Blue, if the V-bottom was detected at the low 15 bars
prior. With a little more programming, I could've painted the actual low
bar at the bottom, but perhaps it is better this way, because the bar is
painted at the point the V-bottom was detected.
Now, oddly enough, over the past 10 years - only in the time span shown
did this type of sharp V-bottom appear. Note that there may have been
other times where there was a chart formation that looks like a
V-bottom, but those occurrences took much more time before and after the
bottom to meet the substantial (-20%) criteria.
Clearly, taking the signals in Sept-1998 and Oct-1998 would've done no
harm, though there was a sharp retracement following the first Sept-1998
peak. On the other hand, the signals in June-2000 and Feb-2001 would've
been just as equally unrewarding.
(the red indicator at the bottom of the page is the simple average of
Nasdaq Advances - Declines). Nothing much to say there except that the
Nasdaq is equally overbought as it was in Feb-2001. Still, as the March
2000 run up shows, that overbought figure can get a lot, lot higher.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Attachment:
Description: "v_bottoms.gif"
|