|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kent Rollins" <kentr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2001 1:57 AM
Subject: [RT] Re: Validity of orbital element
> Mark published and explained this system in detail in ActiveTrader
magazine,
> Norman. And if you didn't feel like coughing up the $5 for the magazine,
> the system was posted on numerous lists including this one shortly
> thereafter along with a few years of data.
>
> Kent,
How does his system prove or disprove Astrological correlations with the
markets? That was the tiopic. Please note how mb has now cleverly shifted
the focus to his trading system which is irrelevant to the topic at hand. I
am sure he appreciates your help.
Cheers,
Norman
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Norman Winski" <nwinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2001 1:01 AM
> Subject: Re: Re[4]: [RT] Re: Validity of orbital element
>
>
>
>
> Well, I knew it was just a matter of time before we got the
markbrown.com
> commercial. This whole conversation was just a setup for mb to plug his
> trading system. If my memory serves me corrrectly, I recall he was kicked
> off this list about 2 or 3 years ago for this sort of thing.
>
> Despamingly,
>
> Norman
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Research Dept." <research@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "MS" <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2001 1:23 AM
> Subject: Re[4]: [RT] Re: Validity of orbital element
>
>
> > Hello MS,
> >
> > M> You are wasting your time with this conversation with Norman. He
wants
> to
> > M> believe what he wants. If you wear colored glasses then the world
will
> > M> look a certain way. Well, Norman has his glasses on...and no
one...and
> > M> I mean NO ONE can tell him other than what he sees.
> >
> > as my numbers show exactly the point.
> >
> > M> If his interpatations works for him...then all the power. Spend your
> > M> time in coversations with others on this list who are so stuck on
> > M> themselves and their point of view.
> >
> > interpretation
> >
> >
>
http://attach2.egroups.com/group/realtraders/attach/2292402/4818/gs-229=24=2
> 292402/10-1-10-84/image=gif/moontrine.gif
> >
> > vs numerical facts (see attached gif)
> >
> > i respectfully rest my case...
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Research mailto:research@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|