|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Hi Earl.
I am in the same situation - fed up with Quote.com, due to their continued
unreliability, and non existent service.
Have a look at this web site, they list a few alternatives
http://wdj.co.uk/software/quote_systems_comparison.html
I hope this helps ??
Steve
----- Original Message -----
From: "Earl Adamy" <eadamy@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "RealTraders" <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 3:45 PM
Subject: [RT] Internet Quote Feed Vendors (Futures)
> I'm re-evaluating quote feed vendors and looking for some feedback.
>
> a) QCharts - been using QCharts (now owned by Lycos) for over 2 years now
> and have stuck with it in spite of intermittent server farm problems for a
> number of reasons including: several years of intraday data on demand
> available on futures contracts (including expired), ability to mix
real-time
> and delayed US futures and stock data depending on exchange subscriptions,
> excellent filtering of intraday data, and a very easy to use charting
> interface. QC obtains their data from S&P Comstock and frequently blames
> data issues and feed interruptions on Comstock. Conditions on QCharts
> continue to deteriorate due to staff cuts and lack of updating and I've
got
> to find an alternative.
>
> b) eSignal - my data feed provider prior to QCharts. At the time I
switched,
> eSignal quality was not as good as QCharts and eSignal frequently lagged
> QCharts by several seconds; however it's entirely possible that eSignal
has
> fixed these problems. At the time, I used Ensign Windows with eSignal. My
> major problems in returning to eSignal are the lack of depth in intraday
> data on demand (I frequently build 60-240 minute charts which include
20-30
> days of data) and the lack of delayed intraday futures data for the NY
> futures exchanges to which I do not subscribe on real-time agreements. I
> believe eSignal maintains its own data plant. The Nov00 review of
real-time
> feeds in Futures magazine gave eSignal good marks except for the inability
> to mix real-time and delayed futures data.
>
> c) CQGNet - appears to be rather complete however carries extreme premium
> pricing. The Nov00 review of real-time feeds in Futures magazine showed it
> to have among the worst error rates and low internet reliability.
>
> d) Bridge/FutureSource - other traders have mentioned that Bridge appears
> to be in deep financial trouble so I'm reluctant to consider their new
> internet data feed which was not reviewed in Futures.
>
> Anything I've missed here?
>
> Earl
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|