PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Thanks for the heads up Earl on the "larger" ABC potential on the daily.
I will watch carefully as the scenario materializes or not (you to Lenny
on the time perspective of wave 4 compared to wave 3). The target
range you mentioned fits relatively well with the 60min wave 5 projections (see
attached gif) off wave 1 to wave 3 added to the bottom of wave 4 (.618 to 1.0
expansions) starting at 105-28 all the way up to 107-7. Neatly tucked just above
the 105-28 level is the MOB off the previous wave 3 which will offer resistance.
Bottom line the "potential" wave B top on the daily fits well, and then an
ensuing wave C would make Lenny happy also :-)
don ewers
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
----- Original Message -----
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From:
Earl Adamy
To: <A title=realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx">realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2001 7:56
AM
Subject: Re: [RT] Bonds
The 5/35 oscillator on my daily March contract data per CSI shows a
145%retracement during w.4 accompanied by a strong penetration of the
loweroscillator strength band. The remainder of the notes are
self-explanatory.In summary, the hourly rally has been strong enough to
warrant a tradinglong position with target in the 105'23-28 area, however
the rally has goodprobability of turning out to be
w.B.4.Earl
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
----- Original Message -----
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From:
Don
Ewers
To: <A
title=realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx">realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 11:25
AM
Subject: Re: [RT] Bonds
FWIW,
The AGET 6/4 ma channel setup on the 60min gave off a wave 4 buy signal
yesterday, so I am still leaning towards the fact that bonds are
headed higher as previously posted and supported on the daily, with backing
and filling of course.
I still think they can move together in the right economic conditions
so this post is in no way reflective of what stocks will do. Is it possible
AG is seeing something we are all missing, like in 1998?
don ewersTo
unsubscribe from this group, send an email
to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
Personalize your company´s name. Choose the domain name below and press SEARCH!www.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
Description: "RB01Hday020901ABC.gif"
Attachment:
Description: "RB01H60min020901Wave5MOB.gif"
|