|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Neil,
Thanks a lot!
BTW, my question was directed to JT , I hoped, in private for which I chose
"Reply"
rather than "Reply All". As it happened before, however, it ended up as
"All".
I asked RT once what is going on and how to reply individually, but received
no
reply.
Anybody knows?
Jan Philipp
----- Original Message -----
From: Neil Kerr <nck1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 10:47 AM
Subject: Re: [RT] Re: The Reason for Nasdaq's Temporary Bounce
> Hello Jan,
>
> IMHO In My Humble Opinion
> Later
> Neil
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "JHP" <jan4123@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 12:17 PM
> Subject: Re: [RT] Re: The Reason for Nasdaq's Temporary Bounce
>
>
> > James,
> >
> > My partner and I have tried to figure out what IMHO stands for and we
> > failed. Please explain it ASAP because our nerves are stretched to
> > the limit -:).
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jan Philipp
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: James Taylor <jptaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 7:51 AM
> > Subject: Re: [RT] Re: The Reason for Nasdaq's Temporary Bounce
> >
> >
> > > True, nobody knows. But I think a heck of a lot of giddy,
dart-throwing
> > > fools lost their shirts,
> > > and retirement savings during this recent dive. The taxi-cab drivers
> that
> > > were offering stock picking advice now have decided that they do not
> like
> > to
> > > trade stocks anymore. The line of lemmings to sign up for the next
> run-up
> > > will be much smaller, IMHO.
> > > and the fear is in the survivors minds what can happen on the
downside,
> > and
> > > that seed of fear will turn this upswing to dust before this year
> ends --
> > I
> > > am watching for the next entry short.
> > >
> > > JT
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Carl Vanhaesendonck" <carl.vanhaesendonck@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 2:02 AM
> > > Subject: [RT] Re: The Reason for Nasdaq's Temporary Bounce
> > >
> > >
> > > > James,
> > > >
> > > > I agree - I was not to say that a new bull market was in order. Just
> > > > that IMO the bears would be taking a nap for a while. Nobody indeed
> > > > can say whether this will be only a upside reaction in a bear
market,
> > > > or a new bull market.
> > > >
> > > > Carl
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxx, "James Taylor" <jptaylor@xxxx>
wrote:
> > > > > I wouldn't go so far as to say a bull market is forming, far from
> > > > it.
> > > > >
> > > > > The lemmings that got their lunch eaten by this last decline are
> > > > wiped-out,
> > > > > and it will take a hell of a long time for the next batch to amass
> > > > enough
> > > > > money
> > > > > to form another bull market.
> > > > >
> > > > > We are at best, in a bear market up leg. I wouldn't get to
excited
> > > > about
> > > > > it, unless you
> > > > > are a bear and are waiting to pounce on the next inflection point.
> > > > >
> > > > > JT
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "Carl Vanhaesendonck" <carl.vanhaesendonck@xxxx>
> > > > > To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 2:48 AM
> > > > > Subject: [RT] Re: The Reason for Nasdaq's Temporary Bounce
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Just one comment, I made the following observation re Nasdaq and
> > > > > > Volume:
> > > > > > The last months were characterized by an inverted volume
behavior
> > > > > > (increase in volume when prices decreased, and decrease in
volume
> > > > > > when prices rised. From the 1st trading day this year, this has
> > > > > > changed: the volume increased increased and decreased in synch
> > > > with
> > > > > > price, which would suggest a bull market is emerging.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > With most indicators, like MACD, there has been not one, not 2,
> > > > but a
> > > > > > triple bullish divergence, which is quite rare and also could
> > > > > > indicate the down-up trend reversal has already started.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We will see...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Carl
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxx, DH <catapult@xxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > > > For me the evidence is building that we have a significant
> > > > bottom
> > > > > > at least
> > > > > > > > as good as fall 1999.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Further evidence, David Tice was a holiday guest host on CNBC
> > > > today
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > was answering questions from little old ladies in investment
> > > > clubs
> > > > > > about
> > > > > > > how to short stocks. :-)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Dennis
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > > > > realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > > realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>
>
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx
|