[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RT] Monitors & dpi



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

There are several things going on here:

* Interference on your phone is caused by RADIO frequency emissions.  
All electronic equipment emits some amount of RF noise.  Some things 
(cordless phones, etc) are INTENDED to create RF, while others do it 
as a side effect of how the electronics works -- sort of "electronic 
pollution."  Your PC's CPU is a fabulous radio transmitter, as is the 
video controller card in your monitor.  Most of this RF noise gets 
shielded inside the PC/monitor case, but some leaks out.  Changing to 
a different screen resolution or refresh rate changes the frequencies 
the monitor generates, and apparently your phone "hears" the new 
frequencies better.  RF is reasonably safe, or at least the RF from 
your monitor is not likely to be a big additional risk.  We all live 
in a sea of RF, unless you abide in a mountain cabin without 
electricity.  Your monitor's RF won't hurt you.  If you're worried 
about RF, I'd be a lot more concerned about your cordless phone, 
cellphone, cellphone towers, local radio stations, power lines, etc.

* The more dangerous emissions from CRT's are generally X rays and 
other high-energy radiation.  Most modern CRT's are pretty well 
shielded from this (there are strict regulations for it), but there 
is still some hazard.  There are still many who feel that the lower-
energy emissions from a CRT can harm you or stress you, and that may 
very well be possible.  Personally I suspect a lot of the gizmos to 
"protect" you from CRT emissions are snake oil -- how is a little 
pendant supposed to block/absorb all RF in the area!? -- but I can't 
say for sure.

* A very likely cause of stress from your monitor is eyestrain caused 
by the refresh rate.  This is how often the electron beam sweeps down 
the screen to repaint the picture.  Like your TV screen, this has to 
happen many times a second.  The faster the refresh rate, the better. 
 If it's too slow for you, you can get eyestrain and headaches.  Some 
people don't object to CRT refresh rates as low as 60 Hz.  Others are 
sensitive to it as high as 72-75 Hz or more.  You'll notice it more 
if you use a light/white background on your charts, and often you can 
notice it more out of the corner of your eye.  Set your refresh rate 
for the highest possible supported by the resolution & color palette 
you want to use.  More color, i.e. 65k colors vs. 256 colors, or 
"high color" (16M colors) vs. 65k colors, requires more RAM per 
pixel.  If you set one too high, the other one will automatically 
decrease.  But I don't think colors affect refresh rate.  Higher 
resolution means the video card needs more RAM to hold all the 
pixels, so it interacts with the color setting.  But more pixels 
means there's more dots to paint, and the video card maxes out in its 
ability to paint dots, so more resolution again usually means the 
card has to "downshift" to a lower refresh rate.  

* I run a 1600x1200 desktop (I like LOTS of stuff on my screen :-) on 
a 19" display, with 65k colors and 75Hz refresh rate.  If I was 
getting eyestrain I'd try moving it up to the next higher refresh 
rate, 85 Hz, though that would require me to go down to 1280x1024.

* The ultimate solution, as Bob H. said, is a flat-panel display like 
an active-matrix laptop screen.  Not only are they smaller and sexier-
looking, they require less power, run cooler, are sharper than CRT's 
(no convergence/etc problems, and no signal distortion from the video 
card, because they don't USE a video card), emit virtually ZERO 
radiation except a bit of RF, have none of the visual distortion 
issues endemic to CRT's, AND they have no refresh issues.  All pixels 
are on at all times.  They are the BEST thing for someone who stares 
at the screen all the time.  Their only real technical limitation 
that I know of is that individual dots can go bad on them, just like 
the screen on a laptop.  Unfortunately they cost about 2-4x as much 
as an equivalent CRT.  :-(  But you shouldn't need as big a screen as 
you're used to -- I understand a 17" flat-panel is exactly equivalent 
to a 19" CRT, or thereabouts.  Apparently they measure them 
differently.

Gary


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx