|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Sorry for the error. You are right 98-26. Ira
Don Ewers wrote:
> Ira,
> Did you mean to say 98-26 in lieu of 96-26?
> don ewers
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ira Tunik" <ist@xxxxxx>
> To: "realtraders" <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, October 13, 2000 10:53 AM
> Subject: [RT] Dec Bonds
>
> > If this high of 99-24 holds and the bonds then hit 96-26 on a
> > retracement there is a high probability of the bonds going to 98 even
> > and then a longer term projection of 96+/- a few ticks. The bonds can't
> > seem to reach my first upside projection of 100 even. It is a little
> > different when starting from scratch after a long absences. Ira
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx
-------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~>
eGroups eLerts
It's Easy. It's Fun. Best of All, it's Free!
http://click.egroups.com/1/9698/0/_/152424/_/971491309/
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx
|