[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[RT] Re: Trend Reflections Trading System



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Why do these posts keep using Trend Reflection Trading System as a subject
when the topic of discussion is stocks or mutual funds? I believe Trend
Reflection is a registered trade or sales mark for a futures trading
program.






----- Original Message -----
From: "EAdamy" <eadamy@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2000 1:20 PM
Subject: [RT] Re: Trend Reflections Trading System


> I have made no secret of the trading methodologies I use - I've posted
tons
> of charts over the years not to mention detailed trades complete with
> charts, entries, exits, and stops in real time. I have generally not
> hesitated to answer questions regarding my trading methods for any reason
> other than time constraints. I have no need for a public ego trip and
there
> is nothing else to be gained, so a trading contest holds no personal
> interest for me.
>
> Earl
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Robert Baker <rbaker@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <eadamy@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2000 10:38 AM
> Subject: Re: [RT] Re: Trend Reflections Trading System
>
>
> > Earl,
> >
> > i recently (end of June) proposed a realtime simulated stock trading
> contest
> > among the members but sadly there was little interest (4 responses) and
no
> > follow thru.  if we will not put our methodologies on the line it can
only
> > be because we prefer to keep our methods secret or because we have no
real
> > methods to share.  what do you think.
> >
> > bob
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Earl Adamy" <eadamy@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2000 9:20 AM
> > Subject: [RT] Re: Trend Reflections Trading System
> >
> >
> > > I've been on this list for some years and have yet to see any
> > > comprehensive real-time trading records posted here. Not that I would
> > > expect to ... this is a non-commercial list and the only individuals
who
> > > would have any incentive to post trading account details would be
> > > someone with something to sell. As for discretionary trading being a
> > > losing game, I'm not about to spend time convincing anyone otherwise;
> > > however I have, on a number of occasions, posted real-time trades in
> > > bonds, stock indexes, and other futures from initial entry through
exit
> > > showing the methods used, all of which are discretionary. There are
> > > exceptions of course, however many systems tend to work for some
period
> > > of time and then blow up. Those who have discovered and developed
highly
> > > reliable trading systems are unlikely to sell the system but rather
> > > trade it or find a trading partner to trade the system for them.
> > >
> > > Again, there are exceptions, however the vast majority of systems
being
> > > sold are worse than trash because the buyer ends up paying for both
the
> > > system and the losses. I'm always interested in looking at systems,
> > > especially those with good real-time trading records (as opposed to
> > > hypothetical trading records using historical daily bars). Gerald
> > > Appel's Time Trend III is a system which has stood up well in
real-time
> > > trading of stock indexes for over a decade and I use much of TT3 logic
> > > in my own equity index investing. I've subscribed to Chuck LeBeau's
> > > trader's club list for some time and have always considered him to be
> > > one of the more astute system builders although I have never purchased
> > > one of his systems. I will admit to some disappointment that Chuck let
> > > the recent RT thread drop without addressing the issues Dennis raised
> > > regarding the use of tick versus daily historical data for back
testing.
> > >
> > > Earl
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Glenn Pederson" <gpeder@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Monday, July 10, 2000 11:14 PM
> > > Subject: [RT] Re: Trend Reflections Trading System
> > >
> > >
> > > > On 10 Jul 2000, at 9:17, Steve McGuire wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >  For example, an account I started trading on Jan 2 this
> > > > > year is up 69.6% and that was after a 15% drawdown. An account I
> > > started for
> > > > > my wife last July is up 126.5%.
> > > >
> > > > I have been on this list for quite a while now and have noticed that
> > > > the only traders that post their trading results are those that are
> > > > trading mechanical systems.  Could it be that discretionary non-
> > > > mechanical trading is a losing game?
> > > >
> > > > Congratulations Steve!
> > > >
> > > > Glenn Pederson
> > > > gpeder@xxxxxxxxx
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>