[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[RT] Re: "Different" Methodologies



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links



Jpilleafe@xxxxxxx wrote:

> In a message dated 7/1/00 11:30:07 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
> nwinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
> << Is there any practical application for this in the markets of which you
> may want to
>  apprise us? >>
>
> Norman, ....WD-40 got it's name from the 40th attempt to get it right.  Most
> of Ron's posts are thought provoking,...at least as to why we should stay
> open minded to new methodologies,...applications,..etc.  Previous posts from
> Ron have been very worthwhile with "different" methods of analysis.  At least
> Ron shares his work results OPENLY with RT forum,... something we could use
> more of.   Much appreciated Ron.
>
> Regards, JIM Pilliod



Jim,

  I agree, art and graphics can be very thought provoking  However, as a
requirement for a "Real Traders' list", should such posted aesthetics be required
to be shown to be relevant to trading the financial markets?  Or, should we post
any graphic without explanation as to its relevancy to the specified interest of
this list?  Perhaps we should establish a list, "Art by Real Traders" that would
encourage the posting of such aesthetics without any relevancy requirement?

Inquiringly,

Norman