[RT] Re: R: Is there's a method in the madness?

["Terry Smith" <tesla@xxxxxxx>]

This discussion about card reading and other forms of market prediction
ignore one important aspect. THE MARKET YOU ARE TRYING TO MASTER. In my
experince the farther away from the market you get with predictions the
worse off you will be financially. In trying to master the markets spend
more time studying the actual market you have chosen and less time away from
that study. One of the best traders I know pays no attention to Astrology,
conspiracies, cnbc, or anything else EXCEPT price action of the market he is
trading. He spends his time studying the actual market he is trading. He is
still taking money out of the market while many a "fortune teller" has gone
bankrupt and left the trading arena.  Happy trading.
----- Original Message -----
From: "James Taylor" <jptaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2000 8:04 AM
Subject: [RT] Re: R: Is there's a method in the madness?


> i've heard it all now.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gram" <gramario@xxxxxx>
> To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2000 7:31 AM
> Subject: [RT] R: Is there's a method in the madness?
>
>
> > There are so many approach to reading the markets, that I was wondering
if
> > anyone has tried market reading using Tarot cards or similar?
> > Seriously,
> > Gram.
> >
> > >Chuck,
> > >
> > >Be wary of "poo-hooing" this time analysis approach to the markets.
Many
> > of
> > >those that include this approach in their arsenal of indicators will
tell
> > >you that the dates often mark a change in trend. Not necessarily a "big
> > >move", and only the bravest would not allow a day's leeway for the
> > >projection.
> > >
> > >I realize time analysis alone is not enough to master trading, but my
> > >experience has been that it's accuracy at times is quite remarkable.
> > >
> > >Should we establish a "trend", other than the sideways affair we've had
> > >since June 2, then June 8th may warrant inclusion in calculations for
> > >possible future "changes in trend".
> > >
> > >Cheers,
> > >
> > >Peter
> > >http://home.golden.net/~laird/Comment.htm
> > >
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: nwinski
> > >Sent: June 11, 2000 3:09 AM
> > >To: CRLeBeau@xxxxxxx
> > >Cc: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >Subject: Re: [RT] Re: June 8th ??
> > >
> > >
> > >CRLeBeau@xxxxxxx wrote:
> > >
> > >> Did anyone notice that the "big move" forecast for June 8th turned
out
> to
> > >be
> > >> an inside day.
> > >>
> > >> So much for ridiculous forecasts.
> > >>
> > >> Chuck LeBeau
> > >> traderclub.com
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>