|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3612.1700"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#d8d0c8>
<DIV><EM><FONT color=#000000 size=2>On the subject of B WAVES : taken from
Elliot Wave Principle by Frost/Prechter.</FONT></EM></DIV>
<DIV><EM><FONT color=#000000 size=2> As a general observation,
"B" waves if Intermediate degree and lower.........usually show a
diminuation of volume, while "B" waves of Primary degree and greater
can display volume heavier than that which accompanied the preceding bull
market,usually indicating wide public particpation.It goes on to add
this"These personality catagories are for the most part suggestive, not
inevitable and thus not stated as rules, but as guidelines. There are always
exceptions to guidelines,but w/o those, good market analysis would be an exact
science, not a probabilistic one. </FONT></EM></DIV>
<DIV><EM><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT></EM><EM><FONT color=#000000
size=2> Interesting note to read as i "thought" B waves
were on lighter volume per say, never hurts to check the book occasionally.
</FONT></EM></DIV>
<DIV><EM><FONT color=#000000 size=2> Also one may look at what ever chart
he studies, wheather its the possible broading triangle on the dow weekly which
is a textbook example for a study in volume and a particular pattern example, or
the index of your choosing.With this it'll be interesting to see of the Dow
fails at about the 50% retrace of the last move or around 10800 area before the
"C"wave begins.</FONT></EM></DIV>
<DIV><EM><FONT color=#000000 size=2>This is just what one source says about B
WAVES and Volume pattterns, as i personally thought B waves were on lighter
volume as a rule, i just didnt read all the rule at one time i guess
:)</FONT></EM></DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Fri Mar 17 17:04:23 2000
Return-Path: <listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from waltt1.thetrellis.net ([208.179.56.11])
by purebytes.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id RAA27124
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 17:01:05 -0800
Received: from REALTRADERS.COM
([208.179.56.198])
by waltt1.thetrellis.net; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 17:01:27 -0800
Received: from mail.niagara.com by realtraders.com
with SMTP (MDaemon.v3.0.0.R)
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 16:53:46 -0800
Received: from ws-9 (dialup-16.niagara.com [209.5.59.16])
by mail.niagara.com (8.10.0/8.10.0.Beta12) with SMTP id e2I0vKK7414616;
Fri, 17 Mar 2000 19:57:21 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <00e401bf9074$97b39cc0$0401a8c0@xxxx>
From: "Tony Pylypuk" <tpylypuk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [RT] Re: remember Saddam
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 19:54:03 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3155.0
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Return-Path: tpylypuk@xxxxxxxxxxx
X-MDRcpt-To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
X-MDMailing-List: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-MDSend-Notifications-To: listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reply-To: tpylypuk@xxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
The (not so) humourous scenario.
1. China launches an attack on Taiwan.
2. America intervenes.
3. World markets go to hell with fear of nuclear war.
4. Robert Prechter declares his vindication.
The historical hedge.
1. Guns and gold.
2. But being from Canada, I suppose I'll have to forego the former and
settle for the latter.
Tony
-----Original Message-----
From: Mervin Yeung <tinyeung@xxxxxxxx>
To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: March 17, 2000 5:02 PM
Subject: [RT] Re: remember Saddam
>HI RTs,
>
>Talking about Geo-politics, I think China does have a point. Many great
>powers in the history had a ocean fleet. Remember Czarist Russia?
>Czarist Russia pushed to reach Black Sea for hundreds of years in order
>to have warm water ports to build her fleets. I read an article that
>quoted an interview: it said China could not even enter Pacific Ocean
>if it did not conquer Taiwan. It makes sense. Without taking Taiwan,
>China cannot build a Pacific fleet. At the moment, Pacific Ocean is in
>America's sphere of influence. If China wants to be a great power, it
>will challenge this situation. (China claims it does not want to be.)
>
>Historically, "Chinese killing Chinese" in civil wars has been the rule,
>not the exception. Keep that in mind. I am a Chinese but what can I
>say? If Taiwanese government allows a vote on "independence or re-join
>China", China will declare war right away. So, Taiwan people don't have
>a voice in this issue, although this issue is somewhat related to their
>livelihood.
>
>Economically and financially, don't under-estimate the global effect.
>Remember that small nation named Thailand and its resulting effects in
>1997 around the world?
>
>Mervin
>
>Dan Harels wrote:
>>
>> If you believe Jane's, China is not equiped to invade Taiwan and won't be
>> for several years. They could, however, lob a few missles in that
direction
>> and they are a nuclear power. The problem is that conflict in Taiwan
would
>> create uncertainty and uncertainty breeds fear and fear breeds panic.
>>
>> Dan
>>
>> >From: HBernst963@xxxxxxx
>> >Reply-To: HBernst963@xxxxxxx
>> >To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >Subject: [RT] Re: remember Saddam
>> >Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 12:55:48 EST
>> >
>> >Wouldn't an invasion of Taiwan just create more demand for U.S. chip
>> >companies? Since invading Taiwan would not affect the oil supply, what's
>> >the
>> >problem?
>> >
>> >Howard
>> >
>> >
>>
>> ______________________________________________________
>> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>
|