|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Out of Office AutoReply: [RT] Re: OIL has almost reached our upside target of 32.35--35.85</TITLE>
<META content="text/html; charset=windows-1252" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2722.2800" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV>I really don't care about knowing if you are out of the office. I have
received a number of this in response to posts to RT - please have the
consideration to unsubscribe or set a filter so these autoreplies are not sent
to those posting to lists.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Earl</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
Crystal, Jeff
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A href="mailto:eadamy@xxxxxxxxxx";
title=eadamy@xxxxxxxxxx>Earl Adamy</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, March 02, 2000 5:44
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Out of Office AutoReply: [RT]
Re: OIL has almost reached our upsi de target of 32.35--35.85</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Thu Mar 02 06:21:08 2000
Return-Path: <listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from mail.thetrellis.net ([208.179.56.11])
by purebytes.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id FAA01452
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 2 Mar 2000 05:19:06 -0800
Received: from REALTRADERS.COM
([208.179.56.198])
by mail.thetrellis.net; Thu, 02 Mar 2000 05:20:05 -0800
Received: from systec1.systec.com by realtraders.com
with SMTP (MDaemon.v2.8.5.0.R)
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 02 Mar 2000 05:13:20 -0800
Received: from h7z9p5 (unverified [167.206.132.190]) by systec1.systec.com
(Rockliffe SMTPRA 3.4.2) with SMTP id <B0005327318@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
Thu, 2 Mar 2000 08:20:15 -0500
Message-ID: <002701bf8449$b5044c20$be84cea7@xxxxxx>
Reply-To: "D Bisnath" <dbisnath@xxxxxxxxxx>
From: "D Bisnath" <dbisnath@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <002b01bf83c7$57ec55a0$4e83bc3e@xxxx> <38BDA105.708EBCBD@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <05b201bf83f5$da1fb340$48dfcea7@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [RT] Re: 30-year Bond dead, RIP
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2000 08:17:48 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Return-Path: dbisnath@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-MDMailing-List: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-MDSend-Notifications-To: listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
My apologies for being ambiguous; I realized the original question may be
interpreted
in two ways:
- the T-Bond trading is very inactive, low volume, or is going down.
OR,
- the T_bond is being pushed aside as the premier Bond trading instrument;
one reads
and hears of the Ten-Year as more representative etc etc.
I am sure most RT'ers are interested in both of the above.
Thanks
----- Original Message -----
From: BruceB <bruceb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2000 10:17 PM
Subject: [RT] Re: 30-year Bond dead, RIP
> Might appear dead if you're still watching the March contract...
>
> Bruce
>
> > D Bisnath wrote:
> >
> > > Is it?
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
|