[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[RT] Mkt: Interesting comment



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Wrong! Dispatches from the Front: A Volatility Nightmare 

By James J. Cramer

1/10/00 5:35 PM ET 

 

Volatility nightmare. Instead of the dot-coms calming down and trading 
with more precision and in smaller increments, the opposite has 
occurred: Everything is now trading like a dot-com. 

Look at the points put on in the semiconductors and the semi-equipment 
stocks. Or check out the action in Compuware (CPWR:Nasdaq), which was 
down 4 in regular trading and is now up 4 after a failed bear raid. 

Sun Microsystems (SUNW:Nasdaq) and Nortel (NT:NYSE) are going nuts on 
the hardware side. And last week Procter & Gamble (PG:NYSE) and Bristol 
Myers (BMY:NYSE) shocked to the upside. 

What the heck is going on? 

We left the office today stunned at the ranges that all stocks are now 
trading in. These are frightening ranges for those of us who like to 
control our risk (and, as a hedge fund manager, that's my key 
variable). We love it, of course, when they go up, but the ride down is 
too hard to hedge against. I'm shaking my head here, wondering whether 
the dot-coms have infected the rest of the market with illiquidity. 

Perhaps, and I am still working on this thesis, what has happened is 
that the market makers in the Nasdaq simply have ceased to try to make 
orderly markets. They are solely acting as agents buying stock and 
selling stock for customers, without positioning a thing. If someone 
wants to buy Oracle (ORCL:Nasdaq), she goes to a market maker and the 
market maker, rather than stopping her on the stock and working the 
stock in, just goes out and lifts all of the offerings. The market 
maker wants none of the risk of the trade. 

(To join the discussion on this article, visit our Message Boards:
http://www.thestreet.com/bbs/Forum4/HTML/000038.html)

 

(To refresh, in the old days, a market maker used to work an order. You 
wanted 15,000 Oracle? He shorted you 5,000 and then he tried to work 
the stock in over time. Now he doesn't short you anything; he is losing 
too much on that 5,000. He just goes in as an agent and buys whatever 
is available from others.) 

Suffice it to say that if you thought that parts of the market were not 
for the squeamish last year, you ain't seen nothing yet. 

The flaw here is that it still doesn't explain how listed stocks became 
so illiquid. That's going to take some digging, but I bet that the 
listed market makers at the big brokerage houses are just as unwilling 
to make orderly markets, too. 

James J. Cramer is manager of a hedge fund and co-founder of 
TheStreet.com. At time of publication, his fund was long Nortel, Oracle 
and Sun Microsystems. His fund often buys and sells securities that are 
the subject of his columns, both before and after the columns are 
published, and the positions that his fund takes may change at any 
time. Under no circumstances does the information in this column 
represent a recommendation to buy or sell stocks. Cramer's writings 
provide insights into the dynamics of money management and are not a 
solicitation for transactions. While he cannot provide investment 
advice or recommendations, he invites you to comment on his column at 
jjcletters@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 

***** 

JW