|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I run NT so I don't have any resource limitations, however SC (same
charting engine as TS) has internal limitations on the number of charts
in a workspace. As a futures trader, I organized and named my workspaces
by category and commodity:
Invest: Funds-Bond
Invest: Funds-Equity Index
....
Trade: Grains-Corn
Trade: Grains-Soybeans
Trade: Grains-Wheat
Trade: Forest-Lumber
...
History: Equities
History: Financials
The only workspaces which consistently maxed out were for history where
I had 8-10 charts in each workspace.
For trading, which I use most heavily, each workspace was setup for dual
monitor with monthly perp and weekly perp on the right and daily perp
and daily front on the left. I've since switched to AGet, however I've
carried the same organization into AGet and it works very nicely. Big
difference with AGet is that I have folders for each category e.g.
Grains and pages for each commodity. Once I open a folder, I can easily
rotate through the pages in the folder.
Earl
----- Original Message -----
From: "ROBERT ROESKE" <bobrabcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Omega List" <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2000 7:55 AM
Subject: [RT] GEN - workspaces and charts
> I've never read any instructions on number of charts in a workspace or
the
> number of workspaces that are open in TS and PS. Am wondering if
there is
> an efficient to approach this. Are the limitations primarily memory
and
> system resources or is there a best way to organize charts and
workspaces
> from a software perspective vs psychological grouping? What
guidelines do
> others use in organizing them? Like what determines whether you add
another
> chart to a workspace or open another workspace? Is there a way to
minimize
> the utilization of Sys\User\GDI resources when creating workspaces and
> charts. Less the better I suppose, but beyond that is there a
> workspace/chart configuration that maximises the capability of the
> hardware/software?
>
> BobR
>
>
>
>
|