|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Return-Path: <mseflin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-To: naples.infi.net%nwinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Received: (cpmta 9270 invoked from network); 6 Oct 1999 23:12:40 -0700
Received: from smtp5.mindspring.com (207.69.200.82)
by smtp.c004-mx000.c004.sfo.cp.net with SMTP; 6 Oct 1999 23:12:40 -0700
X-Received: 7 Oct 1999 06:12:40 GMT
Received: from ix.netcom.com (user-38ldink.dialup.mindspring.com [209.86.202.244])
by smtp5.mindspring.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA21395
for <nwinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 7 Oct 1999 02:12:39 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <37FC3A12.3D681D8@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 1999 01:13:39 -0500
From: MS <mseflin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (Win95; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: nwinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: ADMIN: Realtraders Forum
References: <4.2.0.58.19991006085244.009a1800@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <37FB62E0.D18A9FE0@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <37FBD0ED.84A4BDB1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=x-user-defined
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Norman,
If that is the case then you just got strike one for responding to my response. You
are such a jerk.
Mark
nwinski wrote:
> MS wrote:
>
> > John,
> > Thank you, I'm hoping you are warning the peps who are trafficking in junk. I'm
> > suggesting three strikes and you are out of here, my vote.
> > mark seflin
>
> Mark,
> Under your proposed system, would the above count as "strike one" to your
> account for taking up eveyone's time for something that should have been sent via
> private e-mail? <G>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Norman
>
> >
> >
> > "G.John Boggio" wrote:
> >
> > > Finally, over the last few days there has been a lot of (what I
> > > consider) private and/or junk (non-trading related) messages sent to the
> > > Forum. As we go forward, please refrain from sending such posts to the
> > > Forum as it ties up bandwidth and interrupts the valuable flow of "Trading
> > > related" messages.
|