|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN"><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><B>-</B><BR></DIV></FONT>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE = CITE>
<P><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Norman Winski wrote:</FONT>
<P>> My guess is that when we look back on this in six
month, the gold rally will have turned out to be an excellent
shorting > opportunity. Count me not a bull on bullion.
</P>
<P>> Cynically,
<P>> Pyrite Pete <BR>> AKA Norman
<P>> P.S. I see nothing in the planetary cycles that would have
supported this Gold rally. That says to me that it is bogus >and
will fail. <BR>
<P> </P>
<P><BR>Sorry for late reply, but I have been on the road for a
couple of days </P>
<P><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT>
<P><FONT color=#000000 size=2>You are on the record Norm!</FONT></P>
<P><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Below is a quote from another notable
Finacial Astrologer, Robert Hitt at his free Saturday comment
at <A
href="http://www.astroecon.com/open.html";>http://www.astroecon.com/open.html</A></FONT></P>
<P><FONT color=#000000 size=2>"Last week had a little bit of
outside "interference" stir up the pattern. The
unfortunate fact of life for financial astrologers is that
individual acts by notable persons or significant events outside the
realm of the market CAN have an effect on trading. Astro is
certainly not the only ingredient that moves that
market."</FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=2>It's evident that other financial astrologers didn't
see it comming either. But as we can see, he has another explanation
for the event. It's interesting to note, that he is not excluding
the "conspiracy" theory ("...individual acts of
notable persons...), held by some people. </FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=2></FONT> </P>
<P><FONT color=#000000 size=2>.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT><FONT size=2>You may be right
that there are no astro signs for RISE in gold, but there
where astronomical indications that a BOTTOM could, be in place.
Adding that to Bondtraders Double bottom, the probabillities for a
rise were adding up. </FONT></P>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>I posted the quote below on RT on
Sep 27 when gold was at 266</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>The Low in Gold was on Aug 25. :</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2> <BR>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>"In Ray Merriman's book
"The Gold Book" he says that" ..The Venus/Mars
signautere [aspect], provide one of the most easily defined
correlation to gold price cycles."</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT> (Venus Squared Mars on
Aug 24)</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>The last bottom in gold occured on
Aug 25.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT><FONT
size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>On Aug 24 Jupiter went retrograde and Merriman
says:"In most cases Jupiter retrograde concurred with the end
of a cycle and was then followed by a sharp direction in prices for
at least a week and in some cases lasting 3 weeks" (exactly
what has happend. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV>In other words the bottm was on time.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>In Supertraders Almanc you could read on p415 the 4 (!) days of
this year which Astrowise had the highest probabillity for
trendchange (Astrodays). AUG 24 was one of them!</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>In the same book p362 (aniversery date index), where dates are
listed for the highest probabillity (historically) highs and lows of
the year, you could see that the weighted index for 1999 was Aug 28
- in other words it's no surprise to Frank Taucher (the author) if
the low (of the year in 1999) in Gold came on Aug
24.</DIV></FONT></DIV>
<P><FONT color=#000000 size=2>End quote</FONT></P>
<P><FONT color=#000000 size=2>We may find the answer to Norman's
position already this week since we on Oct 6 have the last
"astropoint" of the the year, as recorded by
"SupertradersAlmanac" these days are notoriously
associated with tops and bottoms and sometimes (15%) we see
acceleration and breakouts in the affected markets
(infected...?).</FONT></P>
<P><FONT color=#000000 size=2>What's interesting with the aspects on
wednesday, is that they include a SUN trine URANUS aspect, and this
is what merriman says: (1982!!)</FONT></P>
<P><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT><FONT size=2>"This
signature [aspect] brings together two very speculative principles.
the expected result would be of great volatility...IN MANY CASES, A
BULL OR A BEARMARKET WOULD BE INDICATED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THIS
ASPECT, THEN SUDDENLY REVERSE, IF ONLY FOR A SHORT
PERIOD."</FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=2>Is anybody else getting goose bumps!</FONT></P>
<P><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Stig</FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=2></FONT> </P>
<P><FONT size=2></FONT> </P>
<P><FONT size=2></FONT> </P>
<P><FONT size=2> </FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=2></FONT> </P>
<P><FONT
size=2></FONT> </P></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Tue Oct 05 06:47:44 1999
Return-Path: <owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from ml.nw.verio.net (ml.nw.verio.net [204.202.220.47])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id FAA27508
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 5 Oct 1999 05:45:17 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by ml.nw.verio.net (970819888) id EAA18769
for realtraders-sendemout; Tue, 5 Oct 1999 04:23:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1.nwnet.net (mail1.nwnet.net [192.220.251.8])
by ml.nw.verio.net (970819888) with ESMTP id EAA18757
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 5 Oct 1999 04:23:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from iron.singnet.com.sg (iron.singnet.com.sg [165.21.7.29])
by mail1.nwnet.net (970819888) with ESMTP id EAA15500
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 5 Oct 1999 04:23:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from amdk62-400 (hs05208.singnet.com.sg [165.21.198.33])
by iron.singnet.com.sg (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id TAA10473
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 5 Oct 1999 19:23:01 +0800 (SGT)
Message-Id: <4.1.19991005191047.00a6bed0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Sender: warlord@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 1999 19:11:56 +0800
To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Andrew <warlord@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Fwd: BULLETIN- GOLD UP $12 AFTER COMEX CLOSE- HANNIBALS
FLEEING - TOM CRUISE
In-Reply-To: <19991005035538.46648.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Status:
So what makes this upmove not a manipulation to squeeze the shorts?
At 08:55 PM 10/4/99 -0700, Larry Muir wrote:
>To anybody who doesn't like gold market information DON'T READ THIS
>and don't send me your hate mail just skip this
>this is educational so it won't interest you.
>I would like to share this letter I was sent because this a huge historic
>event in the markets. I thought what gata was saying made sense and it looks
>like they were accurate. As far as trading goes I would say being long gold
>could be profitable.
>
>
>
>Don't read past this point if you are not interested in something
>educational
>>Many of you know that there are a gazillion
>>390 Dec Comex calls outstanding. We know for a
>>fact that most of them are uncovered calls. A well
>>known floor trader told me that if $390 is taken
>>out to the upside, the Comex could be in VERY
>>SERIOUS TROUBLE.
|