|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=Windows-1252 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<STYLE></STYLE>
<META content='"MSHTML 5.00.0910.1309"' name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Just a comment on the postage thing...</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>The postal people I know would be more than happy to see
private mail disappear altogether, they wouldn't miss it a bit. Profit wise the
majority of money made is on buisness mail and junk mailings. I don't know this
for a fact but by personal experience, looking at my mailbox, this sounds
plausible.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">
<DIV style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A
href="mailto:fritz@xxxxxxxx"; title=fritz@xxxxxxxx>Gary Fritz</A> </DIV>
<DIV><B>To:</B> <A href="mailto:get@xxxxxxxxxxx";
title=get@xxxxxxxxxxx>get@xxxxxxxxxxx</A> ; <A
href="mailto:Realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";
title=Realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>Realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A> ; <A
href="mailto:Realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx";
title=Realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>Realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx</A> </DIV>
<DIV><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, September 28, 1999 8:43 AM</DIV>
<DIV><B>Subject:</B> Re: "alternate postage fees" = hoax</DIV></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>Sorry for the duplicate posting, but somehow my mailer garbled
the first attempt.<BR><BR><BR><?color><?param 7F00,0000,0000>> For whatever
it is worth <BR>> Bill 602P will permit the Federal Govt. to charge a 5
cent <BR>> surcharge ... <BR>> One congressman, Tony Schnell (r) has
even suggested ... <BR><BR><?/color>This is a hoax. See <U><?color><?param 0000,8000,0000><A
href="http://www.usps.gov/news/press/99/";>http://www.usps.gov/news/press/99/</A>99045new.htm</U><?/color>
<BR><BR>There is no "Bill 602P," and no "Congressman
Schnell" exists. <BR><BR>Please, people. We know you mean well, but
forwarding these bogus warnings causes more damage and headaches than you're
ever going to prevent in the unlikely event that one of these things is
actually true. And if it IS really true, I think we can rely on more
traditional news channels to get the word out, instead of chain
letters.<BR><BR>If you really feel you have to forward a warning like this,
check it out first!! There are lots of good places to do that, such as:
<BR><BR><U><?color><?param 0000,8000,0000>http://www.urbanlegends.com</U><?/color>,
<BR>including
<U><?color><?param 0000,8000,0000>http://www.urbanlegends.com/ulz/emailtax.html</U><?/color>
<BR><U><?color><?param 0000,8000,0000>http://urbanlegends.about.com</U><?/color>,
<BR>including
<U><?color><?param 0000,8000,0000>http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/blemtax2.htm</U><?/color>
<BR><U><?color><?param 0000,8000,0000>http://www.ciac.org/ciac/CIACHoaxes.html</U><?/color>,
<BR>including
<U><?color><?param 0000,8000,0000>http://www.ciac.org/ciac/CIACHoaxes.html#emailtax<BR>http://www.symantec.com/avcenter/hoax.html<BR><BR></U><?/color>...and
there are others. Check it out before you propagate a hoax! <BR><BR>Gary
<BR><BR><PRE></PRE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Wed Sep 29 06:29:16 1999
Return-Path: <owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from ml.nw.verio.net (ml.nw.verio.net [204.202.220.47])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA17454
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 29 Sep 1999 01:05:37 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by ml.nw.verio.net (970819888) id KAA14907
for realtraders-sendemout; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 10:47:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1.nwnet.net (mail1.nwnet.net [192.220.251.8])
by ml.nw.verio.net (970819888) with ESMTP id KAA14888
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 10:47:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dmi.net (dmi.net [206.63.164.5])
by mail1.nwnet.net (970819888) with ESMTP id KAA20599
for <Realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 10:47:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fred (56k-v90-spk111.dmi.net [208.213.164.111])
by dmi.net (8.9.0/8.9.0) with SMTP id KAA19042;
Tue, 28 Sep 1999 10:50:03 -0700 (PDT)
Posted-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 10:50:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <001a01bf09d9$32450300$6fa4d5d0@xxxx>
From: "THOMAS BECK" <thombek@xxxxxxx>
To: <fritz@xxxxxxxx>, <get@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <Realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
<Realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: "alternate postage fees" = hoax
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 10:44:52 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0017_01BF099E.7EFDACA0"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.0810.800
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.0810.800
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Status:
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=Windows-1252 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<STYLE></STYLE>
<META content='"MSHTML 5.00.0910.1309"' name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Just a comment on the postage thing...</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>The postal people I know would be more than happy to see
private mail disappear altogether, they wouldn't miss it a bit. Profit wise the
majority of money made is on buisness mail and junk mailings. I don't know this
for a fact but by personal experience, looking at my mailbox, this sounds
plausible.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">
<DIV style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A
href="mailto:fritz@xxxxxxxx"; title=fritz@xxxxxxxx>Gary Fritz</A> </DIV>
<DIV><B>To:</B> <A href="mailto:get@xxxxxxxxxxx";
title=get@xxxxxxxxxxx>get@xxxxxxxxxxx</A> ; <A
href="mailto:Realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";
title=Realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>Realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A> ; <A
href="mailto:Realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx";
title=Realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>Realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx</A> </DIV>
<DIV><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, September 28, 1999 8:43 AM</DIV>
<DIV><B>Subject:</B> Re: "alternate postage fees" = hoax</DIV></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>Sorry for the duplicate posting, but somehow my mailer garbled
the first attempt.<BR><BR><BR><?color><?param 7F00,0000,0000>> For whatever
it is worth <BR>> Bill 602P will permit the Federal Govt. to charge a 5
cent <BR>> surcharge ... <BR>> One congressman, Tony Schnell (r) has
even suggested ... <BR><BR><?/color>This is a hoax. See <U><?color><?param 0000,8000,0000><A
href="http://www.usps.gov/news/press/99/";>http://www.usps.gov/news/press/99/</A>99045new.htm</U><?/color>
<BR><BR>There is no "Bill 602P," and no "Congressman
Schnell" exists. <BR><BR>Please, people. We know you mean well, but
forwarding these bogus warnings causes more damage and headaches than you're
ever going to prevent in the unlikely event that one of these things is
actually true. And if it IS really true, I think we can rely on more
traditional news channels to get the word out, instead of chain
letters.<BR><BR>If you really feel you have to forward a warning like this,
check it out first!! There are lots of good places to do that, such as:
<BR><BR><U><?color><?param 0000,8000,0000>http://www.urbanlegends.com</U><?/color>,
<BR>including
<U><?color><?param 0000,8000,0000>http://www.urbanlegends.com/ulz/emailtax.html</U><?/color>
<BR><U><?color><?param 0000,8000,0000>http://urbanlegends.about.com</U><?/color>,
<BR>including
<U><?color><?param 0000,8000,0000>http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/blemtax2.htm</U><?/color>
<BR><U><?color><?param 0000,8000,0000>http://www.ciac.org/ciac/CIACHoaxes.html</U><?/color>,
<BR>including
<U><?color><?param 0000,8000,0000>http://www.ciac.org/ciac/CIACHoaxes.html#emailtax<BR>http://www.symantec.com/avcenter/hoax.html<BR><BR></U><?/color>...and
there are others. Check it out before you propagate a hoax! <BR><BR>Gary
<BR><BR><PRE></PRE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Wed Sep 29 06:28:19 1999
Return-Path: <owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from ml.nw.verio.net (ml.nw.verio.net [204.202.220.47])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA17384
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 29 Sep 1999 01:02:26 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by ml.nw.verio.net (970819888) id KAA14769
for realtraders-sendemout; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 10:46:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1.nwnet.net (mail1.nwnet.net [192.220.251.8])
by ml.nw.verio.net (970819888) with ESMTP id KAA14757
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 10:46:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from avocet.prod.itd.earthlink.net (avocet.prod.itd.earthlink.net [207.217.121.50])
by mail1.nwnet.net (970819888) with ESMTP id KAA20534
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 10:46:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ibm ([63.25.4.112])
by avocet.prod.itd.earthlink.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA04934
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 10:46:01 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <00c901bf09d9$520e8620$6165fea9@xxx>
From: "ROBERT ROESKE" <bobrabcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "RealTraders" <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re - OEX 660
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 10:45:54 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00C5_01BF099E.A3F3A640"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Status:
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2314.1000" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2>660 is about all we get on strong down days. A crash
would take it to 653.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>BobR</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>
Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\Cone.gif"
|