|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2314.1000" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>The question is, will the rest of the market catch
up to the indicies, or will the indicies move down to the rest of the
market. Only time will tell.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message -----
<DIV style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A
href="mailto:bobskc@xxxxxxxxxxxx"; title=bobskc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>BobsKC</A> </DIV>
<DIV><B>To:</B> <A href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx";
title=realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx</A> </DIV>
<DIV><B>Sent:</B> Monday, September 20, 1999 3:18 PM</DIV>
<DIV><B>Subject:</B> Typical Portfolio</DIV></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV><BR>I knew that my brother buys widely held stocks plus a few
overlooked growth<BR>stocks so I just asked him for his portfolio so I could see
where his<BR>stocks stand in terms of their highs. Below is the list along
with the<BR>highs, current price, correction, if
any.<BR><BR><BR>C 51
3/4 44 1/16
-15%<BR>T 64
1/8 45
1/4 -30%<BR>SUPC 47
1/4
21
-54% <BR>LU 79
3/4 69 13/16 -13%<BR>CNCX
57 5/8 20
3/8
-62%<BR>BLS 51 3/8
43 7/8
-15%<BR>UMG 81 7/8 66
1/2
-20%<BR>SBC
60 49
13/16 -17%<BR>EMT 52
1/2 7
3/8 -80%<BR><BR>Average
correction/drop is 22% if you take out the highest and lowest,<BR>(EMT and
LU). His portfolio is a bit overweighted in
telecommunications<BR>but that's my fault. SUPC is growing at over
30% year but like most<BR>smaller caps is ignored and I too hold CNCX and have
no idea why it doesn't<BR>do better. It's had two strong recommendations
in the past couple of weeks<BR>with targets of $45... I still like it and hold
it.<BR><BR>I doubt anyone would believe that my brother bought these stocks
anywhere<BR>near their high and he didn't of course .. He has very nice profits
in<BR>several of them.<BR><BR>In any case, like a 20+% correction?
Pick your own portfolio .. Use NYC<BR>stocks or NASDQ or a combination of
both. Just don't use internets as they<BR>will distort the figures low and
don't use in vogue cyclicals as they will<BR>weight it high. See what you
get.. I've "thown darts" and come up with 25<BR>- 45%. Could it have
already corrected while we were watching averages?<BR><BR>Bob<BR></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Mon Sep 20 20:25:07 1999
Return-Path: <owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from ml.nw.verio.net (ml.nw.verio.net [204.202.220.47])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA31006
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 20 Sep 1999 18:27:53 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by ml.nw.verio.net (970819888) id SAA14332
for realtraders-sendemout; Mon, 20 Sep 1999 18:05:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1.nwnet.net (mail1.nwnet.net [192.220.251.8])
by ml.nw.verio.net (970819888) with ESMTP id SAA14320
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 20 Sep 1999 18:04:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gull.prod.itd.earthlink.net (gull.prod.itd.earthlink.net [207.217.121.85])
by mail1.nwnet.net (970819888) with ESMTP id SAA07441
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 20 Sep 1999 18:04:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from earthlink.net (sdn-ar-006gaatlaP031.dialsprint.net [168.191.255.143])
by gull.prod.itd.earthlink.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA09819
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 20 Sep 1999 18:04:52 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <37E6DEC5.375BA96C@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 20:26:30 -0500
From: Ruth Alexander <bluemorpho@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en]C-CCK-MCD snapN45b1 (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Jeff Cooper Trading Strategies
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Status:
Was wondering if anyone in this group might have Jeff Cooper's Hit and
Run Trading code for Metastock. I have the book and wrote the following
for the Expansion Breakout Buy signal, but am not sure if it's correct.
Any help would be appreciated.
Best regards,
Ruth
HHV(H,50)
AND
(H-L)>Ref((H-L),-1)
AND
(H-L)>Ref((H-L),-2)
AND
(H-L)>Ref((H-L),-3)
AND
(H-L)>Ref((H-L),-4)
AND
(H-L)>Ref((H-L),-5)
AND
(H-L)>Ref((H-L),-6)
AND
(H-L)>Ref((H-L),-7)
AND
(H-L)>Ref((H-L),-8)
AND
(H-L)>Ref((H-L),-9)
|