|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Timothy Wolfe wrote:
> This is utter nonsense...a lack of tolerance???? Oh puleeeeze !!!!!
> Then would it be ok to introduce VooDoo practices into a good "Shorting"
> methodology??
Tim,
Have you tried VooDoo in your "Shorting" mthodology? Does it work? I wait on
pins and needles
for your reply.
Pointedly,
Norman
>
>
> > John,
> > Sounds like a very closed minded approach. If some people can make astro
> work for
> > trading, why not show a little tolerance. It is the lack of tolerance and
> > flexibility that is the root of many of our problems today and throughout
> history.
> >
> > John Napier wrote:
> >
> > > Several days ago the web master asked that all you
> > > astrologers converse with each other privately through your
> > > own email.
> > > THAT IS STILL AN EXCELLENT IDEA.
> > > I don't want to start a rumble here but why don't we get off
> > > this CRAP and get back to sharing good trading ideas and
> > > information that will
> > > improve our trading techniques. THAT'S WHAT THIS FORUM IS
> > > ABOUT. Not astrology or sun worshipping or occultic signs.
> > > Whoever started this thing why don't you give all those
> > > others who have joined in with their special signs YOUR
> > > private email or still better, why don't you start your own
> > > web page just for that stuff.
> > > I, Like you, don't want to offend anyone..BUT you have
> > > offended me. So lets call it quits right now while you are
> > > ahead.
> > >
> > > TTrue61470@xxxxxxx wrote:
> > > >
> > > > In a message dated 5/12/99 7:46:59 AM Central Daylight Time,
> chmeyer@xxxxxxxx
> > > > writes:
> > > >
> > > > << I'm no rocket scientist, especially as it relates to quant skills--
> > > > but isn't it silly to consider this a valid sample base; and size? >>
> > > >
> > > > I totally agree. At the risk of getting the administration mad at me
> I'd like
> > > > to point out a few things about astrology.
> >
> >
|