[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Gen: moving average



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2014.210" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV>Perhaps my thinking is flawed and I'm counting on you all to tell me if it 
is.&nbsp; I'm fond of displaced moving averages.&nbsp; It makes sense to me that 
if using the average as an entry signal&nbsp;for a long position, that one would 
use an average of the highs as opposed to the commonly used close.&nbsp; </DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>If one is waiting for a breakout or proof of a trend, then stock price 
breaking above the average of highs seems a better indication than breaking 
above the average of closes.&nbsp; Conversely, an average of lows would be used 
for a short signal.&nbsp; Comments?</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Thanks,</DIV>
<DIV>Linda</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>linda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<BR>Climb the 
mountains &amp; get their glad tidings: Peace will flow into you as sunshine 
into flower; the winds will blow their freshness into you &amp; storms their 
energy, &amp; cares will drop off you like autumn leaves. John Muir 1838 - 
1914</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Mon Apr 12 21:39:35 1999
Received: from list.listserver.com (198.68.191.15)
	by mail05.rapidsite.net (RS ver 1.0.2) with SMTP id 10948
	for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 12 Apr 1999 23:36:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with SMTP id UAA10820;
	Mon, 12 Apr 1999 20:35:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp3.erols.com (smtp3.erols.com [207.172.3.236])
	by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with ESMTP id UAA10581
	for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 12 Apr 1999 20:34:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boggio (207-172-150-77.s14.as9.anp.md.dialup.rcn.com [207.172.150.77])
	by smtp3.erols.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with SMTP id XAA21646;
	Mon, 12 Apr 1999 23:34:25 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19990412233403.00c3d200@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 23:34:03 -0400
Reply-To: boggio@xxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: "G.John Boggio" <boggio@xxxxxxxxx>
To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hit & Run Trading  I and II
In-Reply-To: <37100175.3A58006E@xxxxxxxx>
References: <3.0.3.32.19990411074000.00686260@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 <370FF4A7.697099FA@xxxxxxxx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-To: joe6964@xxxxxxxx,
        RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Sender: boggio@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32)
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
X-Loop-Detect: 1
X-UIDL: 8c0c67c2c68c4a1ffe49c1440d101ef0.01

Joe and RTer's,

  Sorry, but I do not have the interview on file.

John Boggio


At 08:57 PM 4/10/99 -0500, Joe Frabosilio wrote:
>I just went to the web site and the interview is gone.  There is an small
>interview, but this is not the one I was talking about.   You'll have to ask
>John Boggio if he still has that interview and back test of Hit and Run.
>
>Sorry,
>
>Joe Frabosilio
>
>Joe Frabosilio wrote:
>
>> Hi Kishore,
>>
>> I have Hit and Run, it was a good stepping stone.  If you are just
>> getting started in daytrading.  I feel that using Hit and Run setups
>> alone, leaves you open for more losses than gains.  So, I bought Street
>> Smarts, this is has very similar setups to Hit and Run but, you were
>> able to get into a position a day sooner, which leaves you more room for
>> better gains. Something was still missing from my trading, then I bought
>> Dynamic Trading by Robert Miner. Then I was able to blend everything
>> together, along with my Level II knowledge and intra day indicator.
>>
>> Please note that if you are a mechanical trader, then you  will have a
>> hard time with any of the systems.  Reason you have to blend and work
>> with them, sometimes they don't work exactly as the book says but with a
>> little bending at times they work great.  In other words you have to use
>> judgment.
>>
>> Goto http://www.realtraders.com and look up the best of realtraders,
>> John Big.... (Sorry about the last name) did some back testing and
>> interview with Jeff Cooper, you might find interesting.
>>
>> Trade Well,
>>
>> Joe Frabosilio
>>
>> Kishore Rochey wrote:
>>
>> > Has anyone read the above books from Jeff Cooper and has any
>> > comments about it.
>> >
>> > Kishore Rochey
>> > Private Clients
>> > Kim Eng Holdings
>> > http www kesecs.com
>
>