|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type><!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3511.1300"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">>I
was looking through the lists on bigcharts, dreyfus and yahoo and find that
each has a differerent list even though the criteria and >date are
exactly the same. Why would this be and which is likely to be the most
authentic?
<P>
<P><FONT color=#000000><FONT size=3>I use Bigcharts and Quotes.com while
doing my research. The objective of any short-term trader should be to
determine which charts/indicators meet his/her criteria for new
entries. As such, I would see divergent information as more of a
benefit than a drawback - clearly each source is screening based on
different factors. As such, this gives you more possibilities which
may meet your personal criteria. </FONT></FONT><FONT
size=3></FONT></P>
<P><FONT color=#000000><FONT size=3>For example, Bigcharts states:
"t<FONT face=Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif>his report ranks the top stocks
with a closing price of 12 or higher, a price change of a half point or
greater, and a 50-day average volume of 50,000 based on their percentage
increase in price". The others must define their screens more
narrowly, more broadly, or by incorporating different inputs. Don't be
concerned about this - either choose the one which best corresponds to your
personal screening approach (if you wish to focus more), or enjoy the
benefit of getting more information for your money (i.e.
free).</FONT></FONT></FONT><FONT size=3></FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=3>Regards,</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face="" size=3>Paul Szilassy</FONT></P></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Sun Apr 04 17:52:37 1999
Received: from list.listserver.com (198.68.191.15)
by mail02.rapidsite.net (RS ver 1.0.2) with SMTP id 24911
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 4 Apr 1999 18:32:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with SMTP id PAA00960;
Sun, 4 Apr 1999 15:28:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp1.jps.net (smtp1.jps.net [209.63.224.236])
by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with ESMTP id PAA00775
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 4 Apr 1999 15:26:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fk928 (209-63-113-167.sea.jps.net [209.63.113.167])
by smtp1.jps.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA05241;
Sun, 4 Apr 1999 15:26:01 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <002801be7eea$1f67dca0$a7713fd1@xxxxx>
Date: Sun, 4 Apr 1999 15:26:00 -0700
Reply-To: szilassy@xxxxxxx
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: "Szilassy" <szilassy@xxxxxxx>
To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: nyse %gainers
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0025_01BE7EAF.71FDFD40"
X-To: <ketayun@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
"RealTraders Discussion Group" <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
X-Loop-Detect: 1
X-UIDL: 359d1337778d14bc140fe24f2244d29e.b0
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type><!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3511.1300"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">>I
was looking through the lists on bigcharts, dreyfus and yahoo and find that
each has a differerent list even though the criteria and >date are
exactly the same. Why would this be and which is likely to be the most
authentic?
<P>
<P><FONT color=#000000><FONT size=3>I use Bigcharts and Quotes.com while
doing my research. The objective of any short-term trader should be to
determine which charts/indicators meet his/her criteria for new
entries. As such, I would see divergent information as more of a
benefit than a drawback - clearly each source is screening based on
different factors. As such, this gives you more possibilities which
may meet your personal criteria. </FONT></FONT><FONT
size=3></FONT></P>
<P><FONT color=#000000><FONT size=3>For example, Bigcharts states:
"t<FONT face=Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif>his report ranks the top stocks
with a closing price of 12 or higher, a price change of a half point or
greater, and a 50-day average volume of 50,000 based on their percentage
increase in price". The others must define their screens more
narrowly, more broadly, or by incorporating different inputs. Don't be
concerned about this - either choose the one which best corresponds to your
personal screening approach (if you wish to focus more), or enjoy the
benefit of getting more information for your money (i.e.
free).</FONT></FONT></FONT><FONT size=3></FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=3>Regards,</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face="" size=3>Paul Szilassy</FONT></P></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Sun Apr 04 17:52:39 1999
Received: from md.egroups.com (207.138.41.139)
by mail05.rapidsite.net (RS ver 1.0.2) with SMTP id 3459
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 4 Apr 1999 18:37:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [10.1.1.21] by md.egroups.com with NNFMP; 04 Apr 1999 23:37:13 -0000
Mailing-List: contact tradersgroup-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx
X-Mailing-List: tradersgroup@xxxxxxxxxxx
X-URL: http://www.egroups.com/list/tradersgroup/
Reply-To: tradersgroup@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-To: listsaver-egroups-tradersgroup@xxxxxxxxxxx
Received: (qmail 31434 invoked by uid 7770); 4 Apr 1999 22:37:10 -0000
Received: from mtiwmhc05.worldnet.att.net (204.127.131.40)
by vault.egroups.com with SMTP; 4 Apr 1999 22:37:10 -0000
Received: from worldnet.att.net ([12.72.33.153])
by mtiwmhc05.worldnet.att.net (InterMail v03.02.07 118 124)
with ESMTP id <19990404223704.EBLM2608@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
for <tradersgroup@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 4 Apr 1999 22:37:04 +0000
Message-ID: <3707E9D5.CD8DD458@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 1999 15:38:13 -0700
From: Joedd <joedd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.07 [en]C-DIAL (Win98; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "tradersgroup@xxxxxxxxxxx" <tradersgroup@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [TradersGroup] YEN "MARKET OPTIMIZER"
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------2D11006AA5AC13D5AF609E92"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Loop-Detect: 1
X-UIDL: 7bf265d830a2de2344928629196623e6.b1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
eGroup home: http://www.eGroups.com/list/tradersgroup
Free Web-based e-mail groups by eGroups.com
Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\YEN3.gif"
|