|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><EM><FONT color=#000000 size=2>RESEND</FONT></EM></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><B>-----Original Message-----</B><BR><B>From:
</B>Gary Kramer <<A
href="mailto:gmkramer@xxxxxxxxxxxx";>gmkramer@xxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>To:
</B>RealTraders Discussion Group <<A
href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>Date:
</B>Tuesday, February 16, 1999 7:03 PM<BR><B>Subject: </B>Market
fills<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
<DIV><EM><FONT size=2>Does anyone who uses FTG have "complaints" about
quality and timliness of fills on Market orders. Today, I had a real lousy
buy fill (1 point) in a normal market and they reported it back to me after over
2 minutes! Similar situations have occurred since I started using
them. Also, the system clock which they use to record transactions was
running about 45 seconds fast today and has run fast on other days too. I
have a web-based atomic clock which I use to calibrate my trades and to see how
timely my quotes are coming in. They are trying to tell me that the system
clock is actual time but I dont believe them</FONT></EM></DIV>
<DIV><EM><FONT size=2></FONT></EM> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><EM><FONT size=2>Any comments would be most welcome</FONT></EM></DIV>
<DIV><EM><FONT size=2></FONT></EM> </DIV>
<DIV><EM><FONT size=2>Thanks</FONT></EM></DIV>
<DIV><EM><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT></EM> </DIV>
<DIV><EM><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT></EM> </DIV>
<DIV><EM><FONT color=#000000 size=2><BR>Gary Kramer<BR>Oak Park, IL
60302<BR>708-401-0382 (Voice mail and Fax)</FONT></EM></DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Wed Feb 17 07:54:17 1999
Received: from list.listserver.com (198.68.191.15)
by mail05.rapidsite.net (RS ver 1.0.2) with SMTP id 2504
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 17 Feb 1999 09:40:30 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with SMTP id GAA10277;
Wed, 17 Feb 1999 06:34:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from imo14.mx.aol.com (imo14.mx.aol.com [198.81.17.4])
by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with ESMTP id GAA10052
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 17 Feb 1999 06:32:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from BobRABCDEF@xxxxxxx
by imo14.mx.aol.com (IMOv18.1) id SNCRa05514
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 17 Feb 1999 09:31:26 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <68d6b6a4.36cad2be@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 09:31:26 EST
Reply-To: BobRABCDEF@xxxxxxx
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: BobRABCDEF@xxxxxxx
To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: MKT - NP and SPX, OEX
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="part0_919261887_boundary"
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 205
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
X-Loop-Detect: 1
X-UIDL: 73c0a57cf3efa1252fffc31ee13e801c.0d
The previous post on NP and the SPX left the big question unanswered...that of
direction. The attached cone chart with Raff regression channels is what I
use for direction and targets. Trend is down and 605 is first target for a
strong down day. A 2 std dev down day would take oex to 595 vicinity today.
BobR
Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\CONE17.zip"
|