PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
If you watch a one minute spooz and the same in bonds you will see that
there continues to be a inverse relationship, most of the time...not always.
<p>Reports:
<br><u>Monday</u>
<br>Existing home sales, treasury statement
<p><u>Tuesday</u>
<br>Bank retail sales; consumer confidence; johnson redbood
<p><u>Wednesday</u>
<br>Mortgage refinancing index; treasury offering 2yr notes
<p><u>Thursday</u>
<br>Intial unemployment claims; Apics bus index; employment cost index;
durable goods; help wanted
<p>Mark Seflin
<p>Earl Adamy wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE> <font color="#000000"><font size=-1>Range on
spoo has narrowed too and the retracements are much larger. If you put
spoo and bonds together, it looks like both are getting setup for a move.
Based on poor action in spoo I suspect the spoo may head south and the
bonds north.</font></font> <font size=-1>Earl</font></blockquote>
</body>
</html>
</x-html>From ???@??? Wed Jan 27 20:13:19 1999
Received: from list.listserver.com (198.68.191.15)
by mail02.rapidsite.net (RS ver 1.0.2) with SMTP id 22176
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 27 Jan 1999 23:03:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with SMTP id UAA05986;
Wed, 27 Jan 1999 20:02:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dfw-ix15.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix15.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.15])
by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with ESMTP id UAA05776
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 27 Jan 1999 20:00:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from smap@xxxxxxxxx)
by dfw-ix15.ix.netcom.com (8.8.4/8.8.4)
id VAA01672; Wed, 27 Jan 1999 21:59:22 -0600 (CST)
Received: from irv-ca39-15.ix.netcom.com(207.93.50.207) by dfw-ix15.ix.netcom.com via smap (V1.3)
id rma001597; Wed Jan 27 21:59:00 1999
Message-Id: <36AFE0D2.A051EB17@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 22:00:18 -0600
Reply-To: mseflin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: M & TC <mseflin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: BONDS
References: <04e001be4a66$99e90f20$172a42cf@xxxxxxx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="------------A92CE89B03C09B88E10784B7"
X-To: eadamy@xxxxxxxxxx
X-Cc: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
X-Loop-Detect: 1
X-UIDL: 49e5608ab4c876affb90f12a7895f021.01
<x-html><!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
If you watch a one minute spooz and the same in bonds you will see that
there continues to be a inverse relationship, most of the time...not always.
<p>Reports:
<br><u>Monday</u>
<br>Existing home sales, treasury statement
<p><u>Tuesday</u>
<br>Bank retail sales; consumer confidence; johnson redbood
<p><u>Wednesday</u>
<br>Mortgage refinancing index; treasury offering 2yr notes
<p><u>Thursday</u>
<br>Intial unemployment claims; Apics bus index; employment cost index;
durable goods; help wanted
<p>Mark Seflin
<p>Earl Adamy wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE> <font color="#000000"><font size=-1>Range on
spoo has narrowed too and the retracements are much larger. If you put
spoo and bonds together, it looks like both are getting setup for a move.
Based on poor action in spoo I suspect the spoo may head south and the
bonds north.</font></font> <font size=-1>Earl</font></blockquote>
</body>
</html>
</x-html>From ???@??? Wed Jan 27 20:13:22 1999
Received: from listserv.equis.com (204.246.137.2)
by mail05.rapidsite.net (RS ver 1.0.2) with SMTP id 17508
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 27 Jan 1999 23:10:25 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id UAA15111
for metastock-outgoing; Wed, 27 Jan 1999 20:08:27 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA15108
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 27 Jan 1999 20:08:23 -0700
From: Wooglinx@xxxxxxx
Received: from imo26.mx.aol.com (imo26.mx.aol.com [198.81.17.70])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA09322
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 27 Jan 1999 20:17:09 -0700 (MST)
Received: from Wooglinx@xxxxxxx
by imo26.mx.aol.com (IMOv18.1) id WWAKa00804
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 27 Jan 1999 21:59:42 +1900 (EST)
Message-ID: <191330cc.36afd29e@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 21:59:42 EST
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Playing the Odds
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 226
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Loop-Detect: 1
X-UIDL: b3215dedd86ebc0f5385093b971a66a1.02
When trading stocks or mutual funds selecting the right stock or fund is a
given. Buying an equity for a trade that has strong fundamentals is important.
Buying an equity that has a positive technical analysis is important. But
buying an equity in a declining or weak overall market is likely to reduce the
chance of success. Yes, these are generalities, but give me a break on this
for the moment <G>.
The point is, we would be better off trading in the general direction of the
underlying market and have the wind to our back so to speak.
The question I pose is, "What method(s), if any, do you use to determine the
probable direction of the market." For starters, one might look for
divergence's in the DJIA or SPX and the Adv-Dec line. Or applying the ADX or
Stochastic.
One that has some promise is the Parabolic SAR using the canned parameters in
MS. Take a look at the Parabolic SAR against the DJIA, the SPX, or the NASDAQ.
What's your method?
Jim Barone
|