[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: S&p analysis



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

DEFY HUMAN NATURE, DO THE WORK YOURSELF- LARRY PAESAVANTO
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Alexander <gta3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tuesday, November 03, 1998 7:56 PM
Subject: Re: S&p analysis


>Miner's count may be wrong but his software does not generate Elliott
>counts. He derives his counts the old fashion way - using that little
>processor between the ears. A lost concept.
>
>Regards,
>
>Tom Alexander
>
>----------
>> From: Peter [KKD] <derivatives@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: Re: S&p analysis
>> Date: Tuesday, November 03, 1998 2:26 PM
>>
>>     For those who are interested in elliott analysis, take  my sincere
>> advice...elliott wave software programs is  not elliott wave theory .
>What
>> it is , is generally a software program  thats a "system". It may make
>money
>> yes,  but it is generally not elliott.  No software program, at least in
>my
>> life time will ever in my opinion  conduct true elliott analysis...it may
>> conduct pattern analysis but that is not structural analysis . Structural
>> analysis is wave elliott wave theory is all about.
>>     FWIW Miners count is wrong..but hey I'm not a computer
>> Peter Karaguleski
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Peter2150@xxxxxxx <Peter2150@xxxxxxx>
>> To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Wednesday, 4 November 1998 6:18
>> Subject: Re: S&p analysis
>>
>>
>> >In a message dated 98-11-03 12:10:02 EST, tesla@xxxxxxx writes:
>> >
>> >> For all the S&P traders out there Bob Minor does a great job of
>analyzing
>> >> where the market is most likely headed in the next few weeks. The
>> analysis
>> >is
>> >> at his web site www.dynamictraders.com under current trade
>> recommendation.
>> >> Good day.
>> >>
>> >
>> >So...    Have you tracked it to see if it is right.
>> >
>>
>