|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3509.100"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2>I had the same problem with my Internet provider. After 20
minutes with no activity I was unceremoniously disconnected. So I called my
computer buddy and asked him what can be done about it. He referred me to a
program called STAY CONNECTED 2.0, you can buy it at your local software store.
Anyone trading with PMB over the Internet does not need this program as their
screens are auto refresh to avoid this problem. Hope this helps.</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><B>-----Original Message-----</B><BR><B>From:
</B>Peter (KKD) <<A
href="mailto:derivatives@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>derivatives@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>To:
</B>RealTraders Discussion Group <<A
href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>Date:
</B>Friday, October 30, 1998 10:14 PM<BR><B>Subject: </B>LINE DROP
OUTS<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>This is of the topic but probably someone
can assist,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2> I have been
incurring frequent line drop outs on my internet connection since I have
been with a new ISP. The error message that come up is " The
connection to the server was reset". If anyone has experienced
such a problem & has been able to fix it (with utility software or what
ever), please send me an email. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Peter</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Sat Oct 31 12:05:07 1998
Received: from list.listserver.com (198.68.191.15)
by mail02.rapidsite.net (RS ver 0.3) with SMTP id 7321
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 31 Oct 1998 12:50:39 -0400 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with SMTP id JAA12276;
Sat, 31 Oct 1998 09:42:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from infowest.com (ns1.infowest.com [204.17.177.10])
by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with ESMTP id JAA12157
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 31 Oct 1998 09:41:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from brentast (dialup6-68.infowest.net [207.49.60.221])
by infowest.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id KAA00476;
Sat, 31 Oct 1998 10:40:38 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <002301be04f3$fe644220$dd3c31cf@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 1998 10:24:42 -0700
Reply-To: brente@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: "BrentinUtahsDixie" <brente@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: TO ALL THE IDIOTS THAT THINK THAT THE FED IS CONTROLLED, ETC
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-To: "RealTraders Discussion Group" <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
<swp@xxxxxxxxxx>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
X-Loop-Detect: 1
X-UIDL: ba1d876502b7b382b086d0c531d073ae
Ah come-on Steve take off your rose colored glasses. Can you honestly tell
me that there has never been efforts to manipulate the markets? Although I
don't expect that I will convince you of anything; as I have gotten older I
have realized that Murphy's law applies to all sorts of manipulations. It
sometimes takes 40 years to find out but it happens all the same and allthe
time.
It would be naivete to not allow for the possibility of manipulation in the
markets there certainly has been manipulation in the past. A strong rally
just before an election (in which a beleaguered President has much to lose)
that began with a mighty shove from the fed would seem to be some evidence
to me. Unless congress investigates we will likely never know. Since history
is replete with plots, manipulation and conspiracies, I will not disallow
the possibility.
Brent
-----Original Message-----
From: steven poser <swp@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Saturday, October 31, 1998 8:48 AM
Subject: TO ALL THE IDIOTS THAT THINK THAT THE FED IS CONTROLLED, ETC
>I am constantly amazed at what people will believe. What I love best
>about folks that believe in conspiracy theories, that the Fed buys
>futures (Earl, though I disagree with you on the futures purchase stuff,
>you are obviously not in the idiot category.)
>
>Alan Greenspan is the consummate market behaviorist and technical
>analyst. I am not suggesting that he sits there and draws lines, looks
>at OBV and RSI. But, he may be the only Central Banker in the world who
>understands how to mollify the markets. I wrote to my clients back
>before the first rate cut that the Fed would go again between meetings
>if they only went 25 bps on 29-Sep. I made this call based on how I
>thought the markets would react, and how I figured Greenspan would react
>to that. The day that the Fed cut again, was the first time I saw
>inklings of the market getting ready to turn lower. I think if the Fed
>had not cut then, we'd be at 6800 now and not 8600.
>
>Alan Greenspan almost certainly has no great love for Bill Clinton.
>Clinton is a Democrat and Greenspan is a Republican. So, Alan is not
>saving Bill. He is not saving a Republican Congress either that sits
>there and asks for rate cuts also when the economy is humming along. The
>FED is and must be fiercely independent.
>
>LOOK WHAT HAPPENS WHEN A CENTRAL BANK IS BELIEVED TO BE CONTROLLED BY
>THE GOVERNMENT (OR ACTUALLY IS CONTROLLED BY THE GOVERNMENT). LOOK HOW
>ENGLAND AND FRANCE HAVE IMPROVED THEIR ECONOMIES SINCE THEIR CENTRAL
>BANKS GAINED MORE INDEPENDENCE. LOOK AT THE FRIGGIN MESS JAPAN IS IN
>BECAUSE THE BOJ IS NOT INDEPENDENT.
>
>IF THERE WAS A TRUE BELIEF (AND FOR THAT MATTER REASON TO BELIEVE) THAT
>THE FED WAS CONTROLLED BY ANYBODY BUT THE CENTRAL BANKERS, THE DOW WOULD
>BE AT 5000 NO MATTER HOW LOW GREENSPAN PUT RATES. THAT IS HOW MUCH
>CONFIDENCE WOULD BE LOST.
>
>OH, AND THE FED IS ALSO NOT CONTROLLED BY WALL STREET. IF IT IS GOING IN
>TO SAVE STREET FIRMS, IT IS TO PREVENT A PANIC. I WAS NOT THERE IN 1929
>WHEN BANKS FAILED LEFT AND RIGHT. DO YOU WANT TO SEE THEM FALL LIKE
>DOMINOES?
>
>Remember, though how Wall Street goes, is not how the whole economy goes
>(did you see GDP yesterday? -- AND PLEASE DONT TELL ME THE FIGURES ARE
>RIGGED OR I'M GOING TO PUKE), failures are a different story. The
>markets are all about psychology, expectations and behavior. Nobody is
>better at managing that than Alan Greenspan. If it looks as if the Fed
>is controlled, it is only because knows how to pull the strings.
>
>Steve
>
|