|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2>I'm familiar with this system and occasionally use it to
trade</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>the Spoo. It works well when market is normal and does
not</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>give market turning points (support/resistance) during
volatile</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>days like today. It comes with 2 or 3 basic MA
indicators (but I'm </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>only using 1) </FONT><FONT size=2>that is used with 1-minute
bars. The system scalps </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>1-3 points </FONT><FONT size=2>per trade and you may get 3-5
trades per day. There's </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>also </FONT><FONT size=2>an advanced course for $2,500 (last I
checked) that covers</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>breakouts. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>When I first started using this system, it put a huge
distraction on</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>my concentration as I was trying to apply it and integrate
with my</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>system. And as a result, I end up losing a couple of
trades. Since then</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>I stopped using it and went back to my own system. Word
of advice:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Use this only by itself and do NOT mix it with other
systems. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Conclusion: If I could return the material to Ned, I
would...</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>-ernest</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2> </FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><B>-----Original Message-----</B><BR><B>From:
</B>Gary Kramer <<A
href="mailto:gmkramer@xxxxxxxxxxxx";>gmkramer@xxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>To:
</B>RealTraders Discussion Group <<A
href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>Date:
</B>Thursday, October 01, 1998 11:56 AM<BR><B>Subject: </B>Winning Edge
S&P Day trading system<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Anyone using the above and have anything
good or interesting</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>thanks</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2><BR>Gary
Kramer<BR></FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Thu Oct 01 13:28:56 1998
Received: from list.listserver.com (198.68.191.15)
by mail05.rapidsite.net (RS ver 0.3) with SMTP id 16250
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 1 Oct 1998 15:51:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with SMTP id MAA10242;
Thu, 1 Oct 1998 12:44:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out.epix.net (out.epix.net [199.224.64.56])
by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with ESMTP id MAA10110
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 1 Oct 1998 12:41:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from maggie (qrvl209-74-47ppp60.epix.net [209.74.47.60])
by out.epix.net (8.9.0/8.9.0/1998093001/Philippe Levan) with SMTP id PAA22720
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 1 Oct 1998 15:41:10 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <3613DACF.5E97@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 1998 15:41:03 -0400
Reply-To: ariel@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: "ariel@xxxxxxxx" <ariel@xxxxxxxx>
To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Long Term Capital
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (Win95; U)
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
X-Loop-Detect: 1
R/T's
I have been following the posts about LTCM with eager interest. I must
say there have been some wonderful posts that have helped explain what
went on with them.I have heard the term "notionally
funded" in regards to LTCM. Would someone please explain this term.
thanxs Harry
|