|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.2106.6"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Group:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>I am looking for an oscillator that is very rhythmic. In other
words, something that is NOT a trend indicator but one that turns from an
oversold point and will indicate the beginning of a climb in price without a one
day decline making the oscillator go down. Stochastics seems to fit the need but
I wondered if anyone can suggest others. I am looking for a quick in and quick
out.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Thanks in advance to responding.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Steve</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Tue May 19 08:25:07 1998
X-POP3-Rcpt: neal@xxxxxxxxx
Return-Path: <owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from accessone.com (list.listserver.com [198.68.191.15])
by purebytes.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP
id HAA25392 for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 19 May 1998 07:26:05 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with SMTP id IAA07207;
Tue, 19 May 1998 08:15:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imo25.mx.aol.com (imo25.mx.aol.com [198.81.17.69])
by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with ESMTP id IAA07040
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 19 May 1998 08:12:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BobRABCDEF@xxxxxxx
by imo25.mx.aol.com (IMOv14.1) id OSNKa03031;
Tue, 19 May 1998 11:11:46 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <d0abffa5.3561a133@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 May 1998 11:11:46 EDT
Reply-To: BobRABCDEF@xxxxxxx
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: BobRABCDEF <BobRABCDEF@xxxxxxx>
To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Index Leaps
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-To: David.D.Cicia@xxxxxxxxxx, realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 16-bit for Windows sub 38
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
I don't suppose it happens very often, but Fidelity has been known to have the
wrong cusip number matched with the wrong options. I.E. one time I tried
buying an NDX option and they sold me a Gaming index option. Also Fidelity
has been notorious for not having the new strikes entered for computerized
trading when the mkt moves into new strike range. For their credit they
usually will give the lower commission if you tell them you tried to enter it
via computer but had to call a live broker. Best to bring the issue up with
the broker when actually placing the trade. Just ask for the FOX + or
whatever commission and they will give it if the online system was down or
would not respond properly.
BobR
In a message dated 98-05-19 10:16:04 EDT, David.D.Cicia@xxxxxxxxxx writes:
<< Stan,
Thanks for your reply. I trade with Fidelity on their website. It
wouldn't take my order for LSXXB and neither would their broker when I
called. Both said they couldn't get quotes on it. I finally called the CBOE
and asked what the Dec 99 110 puts were and was told LSXXI, so that is what
I bought. Fidelity's website took that order.
Is this the wrong info? I am in the dark since I cannot get anything
from my broker, and BMI doesn't have LSX listed in the options that I get
(they have LSY and LSZ - which, by the way, is listed on the CBOE website
as Dec 2000 leaps.) So the whole thing is somewhat bewildering.
I am not trying to trade these things, just use them for portfolio
insurance based on my view that the stock market is very vulnerable here.
Thanks for your response,
David Cicia
>>
|