[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Silver



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Maybe Warren Buffet should have consulted an EW expert.

Tproeber@xxxxxxxxxx



> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Roy A. Fellars [SMTP:fellars@xxxxxxx]
> Sent:	Thursday, February 26, 1998 3:31 AM
> To:	RealTraders Discussion Group
> Subject:	Silver
> 
> On Tue, 24 Feb 1998 16:05:50 PST, John Boggio wrote:
> 
> 
> >As a matter of fact, why don't we make this market
> >our "Market of the Week" here on Realtraders.  I hope to hear other
> >opinions on this interesting market.
> 
> John:
> 
> I'll give you a contrary opinion.
> 
> My work suggests that silver made an important peak in early February
> which is essentially 
> equivalent from a wave/time perspective to the peak gold made two
> years ago.  There are several 
> similarities.
> 
> 1) The peak occured exactly two years from the emotional peak in gold
> in February, 1996 and was 
> emotional in nature as the shorts panicked. One can assume since they
> are both precious metals 
> that there time points are also probably related.  Two years is the
> length of the F15 interval in the 
> Spiral Calendar which, IMO, is the best method of measuring emotion
> over time in markets.  F15 
> also has solar harmony.
> 
> 2) The peak at $7.50 retraced *exactly* 38.2% (a fibonacci percentage)
> of the previous long term 
> down move from 1983 (secondary failure peak) to 1992.  If this was a
> new bull market in silver that 
> particular retracement line would logically have no meaning and
> therefore no effect other than a 
> random number.  The fact that the market stopped and retraced
> significantly at the number 
> suggests that the bear market in silver which started in 1980 is still
> in effect and that silver will 
> eventually retrace all the way back to and probably through the $3.50
> per ounce low.
> 
> 3) The move from the 1992 low was an a-b-c rally where wave b was
> complex and retraced a 
> fibonacci 66.7% of a.  Wave c was also approximately 1.618 times the
> length of wave a.  A rally 
> (or decline) which exhibits that relationship between two impulse
> waves is normally a corrective 
> sequence.  Pure bull markets tend to ignore those types of
> relationships.  This particular formation 
> with the same exact relationships led to the 1996 high in gold through
> its stock proxy, the XAU.
> 
> 4) In 1996 when gold was running, silver was doing nothing.  In 1998
> silver is running and gold is 
> doing nothing.  These markets ought to be moving together in a new
> bull market IMO.
> 
> I'm attaching the file silver2.gif to this message which shows the
> Elliott Wave count of the rally 
> from 1992 to present and graphically illustrates my point.
> 
> RAF << File: SILVER2.gif >>