|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
At 11:30 AM 2/3/98 UT, Bill Eykyn wrote:
>
>
>Peter2150 wrote:
>
>I'd like to suggest that periodically John send out a post that everyone
>responds to and if you don't respond you are removed. Or something like
this.
>Anyone else have any ideas's
>==========================================================
>For my two pennyworth, I would say that it is simply not worth getting all
>steamed up about such posts. They are always headed "Unsubscribe" or
include
>the word in the text, so that all you have to do is press the delete button.
>
>It is these heavy .gif files which are the real pain, if they are not your
>subject. In England, I have to pay to receive them, before pressing the
>delete button, which is very irritating. I suppose it can't really be
helped
>and, such is the general quality of the forum, that one has to put up with
it.
> Still, anyone got some ideas on that one?
>
>As all those who have been on this forum for a year or more know, I only
trade
>the T-Bonds, so when one is getting specific, lengthy posts on the S&P, the
>OEX, stocks and shares, etc, it is a 'bore' to have to delete them - but
it is
>hardly a headache, if they are well headed. Anyway, I would rather have to
>put up with getting stuff I don't want, in order to get the odd pearl that
>appears. For example, the posting about some new indicator with an .ela
file
>is always worth a look... The posts on computer problems can be very
helpful
>(especially, if like me you are rather more literate than numerate!) and are
>worth storing... There are certain contributors who rate a file, because
>their posts are nearly always worth saving for reading later (I will spare
>their blushes, but I bet any list of names would be 'dittoed' by many...
>Etc, etc.
>
>Anyway, let me say that I think we owe a huge debt to Mssrs Kwong, Boggio,
>Billington, et al at Kasanjian Research for running this show. RT has to be
>one of the better forums for traders to follow. It is probably the best
>organized and moderated website within the trading business.
>
>t-bondingly
>
>Bill
>
>
>
>
I don't have a problem personally with the .gif attachments. But I do not
pull everyone of them up either.
Perhaps the .gif offerings should be required to be downloaded after the
fact, not be attached to e-mail to this site. Is there a way to prevent
attachments?
>
>
petena9090@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|