|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.2106.6"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000>RTs</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT color=#ff0000>With due respect to the posting traders'
"copyrights", here is a small recap from my
archives:</FONT></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT color=#ff0000></FONT></STRONG> </DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT color=#ff0000>1. Norman Winski and BobR - 12/03/97 on Lunar
aspects:</FONT></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV><BR>> Norm, what are your Lunar Aspects for today? Anything
significant? Let's<BR>> see how they compare to fib lines and the
pivots today.<BR><BR>All Times are EST. This was typed at 2:15 PM EST, Dec. 3,
1997.<BR><BR>9:53 AM Moon Comj. Venus = so far the high of the day in
S&Ps.<BR>3:29 PM Moon Conj. Neptune = ?<BR><BR>Lunar aspects tend to
have a one hour orb of influence. In otherwords,<BR>watch for the Moon to start
to influence the market one hour before,<BR>climax near the time of the aspect,
and then the influences wanes<BR>quickly during the waning hour. For example,
this morning, the market<BR>rallied into Moon Conj. Venus (as would be expected)
and then topped<BR>within five minutes of the exact aspect (9:53 AM) and then
declined for<BR>almost exactly one hour. This morning's aspect and market action
fit the<BR>ideal almost perfectly. However, it does not always work this well.
But,<BR>when the set up is right, as it was this morning, your odds of
making<BR>money are very good and then even for those times when it doesn't
work<BR>so well you usually get a chance to break even. So, when the setup goes
<BR>as expected, this is a low risk trade. <BR> For those who are
skeptical and think I am making this up after the<BR>fact, a check of an
ephemeris or planetary aspectarian will reveal that <BR>the Moon was Conjunct
Venus at 9:53 AM and that there were no other<BR>significant events this
morning. I can not change this time or the<BR>market's action. <BR>
One final note, the Lunar aspects that fit the above model have<BR>tended to be
counter trend points, i.e. tops were good for one to a few<BR>hours but then
then market went higher and conversely aspects that were<BR>lows were good for
one to a few hours but then the market went lower.<BR>The market action this
morning indicates to me that the market is likely<BR>to go higher, but this is
subject to seeing how the market behaves into<BR>the<BR>Moon Conj. Neptune at
3:29 PM.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT color=#ff0000>BobR also later sent this
gif:</FONT></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>FYI, here is how Norman's Lunar Aspects plotted.<BR>BobR<BR>
<P>Picture Attachments:</P>
<HR>
<P>
<CENTER><IMG src="cid:054201bd1c43$aad64e80$f0092399@xxxxxxxxxxx";></CENTER><BR>
<CENTER><B>File:</B> LUNAR ASPECTS.gif</CENTER>
<HR>
<P>
<CENTER> </CENTER><BR></DIV></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT color=#ff0000>2. Norman on the Moon and
Volatility:</FONT></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000>Volatility is a cyclical phenomena and I have worked
out<BR>some of the intermediate to long term cycles that correlate with
the<BR>highs and lows for stock market volatility. The longer term cycles
are<BR>strongly correltated with the Moon's North Node's longitude and
its<BR>18.61 year cycle. There is a cofunction of the Moon's North Node
related<BR>to the maximium monthly amplitude of the Moon's declination (the Moon
in<BR>Astrology represents emotion) which very accurtely descrbibes
the<BR>volatility factor on a long term cyclical and historical basis. A
study<BR>of some of these cycles is available in the 1997-98 Forecast &
Trading<BR>Manual by Norman Winski in which I have a vested financial interest
and<BR>I am totally biased as a result. <BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000><STRONG><FONT color=#ff0000>3. Norman, responding to a
query on </FONT></STRONG><FONT color=#ff0000><STRONG>"Full Moon on Dec
15-16 1997"</FONT></FONT><FONT color=#ff0000></FONT></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>NW: I would not be surprised to see some panic circa 12/15-16, but
the<BR>Full Moon is just one contributing factor. One must also be aware of
the<BR>other planetary influences. <BR></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT color=#ff0000>I think you get the picture.
</FONT></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT color=#ff0000></FONT></STRONG> </DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT color=#ff0000>Please contact Norman/BobR or look up some
astrology websites for further insight - I'm not even a beginning student of
astrology yet so I can't answer any questions that may
arise.</FONT></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT color=#ff0000></FONT></STRONG> </DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT color=#ff0000>Kurt had previously backtested price action
correlations with New Moon and Full Moon dates and written up the results. I
forget the conclusions. I think BobR also tracked it for some time and made some
modifications. This is easy to do using Excel and data on past moon dates so I
won't go into it here.</FONT></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT color=#ff0000></FONT></STRONG> </DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT color=#ff0000>Regards</FONT></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT color=#ff0000>Gitanshu</FONT></STRONG></DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>
Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\Moon - Long post - delete if no.gif"
|