[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Dec. Gold



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

For those Point & Figure chartists:

Attached is an P&F chart of Dec. GC with box size=1.5, and a three-point
reversal method.  If the GC closes below our 319.50 support line, can we
make a fare assumption this market is about to take a major dive down!!!
This is well in concert with the major trend. Moreover, today's price
action was a reversal to the O's column!

Please let me know what you think about this set-up?

Many thanks,

Frank
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML//EN">

<html>

<head>
<title>HTML document for the World Wide Web</title>
<meta name="GENERATOR" content="MetaStock 6.0">
</head>

<body>
<h2 align=center>GC_DEC.097<br>
(GC_DEC.097) </h2>
<p align=center><img src="Dec_gc.jpg" align=bottom> </p>
<h3 align=center>Data for 07/23/97 </h3>
<div align=center><center>
<table border=1 ALIGN="CENTER">
<tr><td><table ALIGN="CENTER">
<tr><td><font FACE="Arial"><font color="#000000">Value</font></font></td><td><font FACE="Arial"><font color="#000000">0.0000</font></font> </td></tr><tr><td><font FACE="Arial"><font color="#000000">GC_DEC.097</font></font></td><td><font FACE="Arial"><font color="#000000">IndicatorName</font></font> </td></tr><tr><td><font FACE="Arial"><font color="#000000">Column</font></font></td><td><font FACE="Arial"><font color="#000000">30</font></font> </td></tr><tr><td><font FACE="Arial"><font color="#000000">7/23/97</font></font></td><td><font FACE="Arial"><font color="#000000">331.50  O</font></font> </td></tr><tr><td><font FACE="Arial"><font color="#000000">7/23/97</font></font></td><td><font FACE="Arial"><font color="#000000">330.00  O</font></font> </td></tr><tr><td><font FACE="Arial"><font color="#000000">7/23/97</font></font></td><td><font FACE="Arial"><font color="#000000">328.50  O</font></font> </td></tr><tr><td><font FACE="Arial"><font color="#000000">7/23/97</font></font></td><td><font FACE="Arial"><font color="#000000">327.00  O</font></font> </td></tr>
</table>
</td></tr>
</table>
</center></div>
</body>

</html>
</x-html>From ???@??? Wed Jul 23 23:04:29 1997
Received: from smtp2.nwnexus.com (smtp2.nwnexus.com [198.137.231.18])
	by mail1.halcyon.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA25252
	for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 23 Jul 1997 20:18:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list.listserver.com (list.listserver.com [198.68.191.15])
	by smtp2.nwnexus.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA14730
	for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 23 Jul 1997 20:16:44 -0700
Received: from host (localhost [127.0.0.1])
          by list.listserver.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP
	  id UAA31544; Wed, 23 Jul 1997 20:15:59 -0700
Received: from smtp.gte.net (smtp.gte.net [207.115.153.29])
          by list.listserver.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP
	  id UAA31431 for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 23 Jul 1997 20:15:21 -0700
Received: from default (tpm228010.gte.net [207.115.228.10])
	by smtp.gte.net (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) with ESMTP id WAA29100;
	Wed, 23 Jul 1997 22:16:06 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <33D6C8D1.5B6361DA@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 1997 23:15:30 -0400
Reply-To: fletchmo@xxxxxxx
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: fletchmo <fletchmo@xxxxxxx>
To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: MKT  Forecasts:  Allan and Norman
References: <970723213958_105069688@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-To: MRLYNNG@xxxxxxx
X-Cc: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.01 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
X-UIDL: d16b13c601db0eaa5f5c766e75fca16d

MRLYNNG

Since You mentioned it - "I will volunteer but I think it might be
better if"   .........if what? Isn't the RT what this is all about?

Voulonter - Your advice" - don't back-peddle now!

btw- I reponded to your complaint to the Omeag Group as to a so-called
remedy with AOL - did not hear a thing - but FYI- hear is another
confirming voice.  Gosh! I know what I am talking about.   Your'e
welcome!!!!

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Subject:
             RE:omega digest file attachments
  Resent-Date:
             Wed, 23 Jul 1997 19:25:33 -0700
 Resent-From:
             omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
        Date:
             Wed, 23 Jul 1997 19:25:27 -0700
        From:
             "W. David Elden II" <dyslexic@xxxxxxx>
  Organization:
             Misery Love's Companie
          To:
             MCPCBKV@xxxxxxx
         CC:
             Omega Digest <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

Michelle

The best way out of the dilema you describe is to quit AOL and  get a
real ISP. That way you will have all the benefits of real Internet,
without the overhead and hassles of AOL. Sorry but that is the best way
to get away from the problem you describe.  File attachments are a way
of life on the Internet, but AOL is not the Internet, and is not
designed to  work with the Internet in a very friendly way. Complain to
AOL.

d
> I have AOL, and have a tremendous amount of problems deciphering the
material
> when you attach a file. Can't you just include everything in the
initial
> email, without having to download, and then go through all the
troubles of
> trying to decipher, and then find out that most of the time, it was
simply
> not worth the effort. Is there a way out of this dilemma?
>
> Thank you.
>
> Ms. Michelle Poll
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

@aol.com wrote:

> Allan and Norman:
>
> I that agree that your subscribers should come first but if you really
> want
> to compare cycles, results etc. give signals to a third party (or two)
> who
> will release the comments after the forecast expires.  The third and
> fourth
> party's would agree not to disclose the information to anyone.  There
> should
> be 2 people so no one can be accused of playing favorites.
>
> I will volunteer but I think it might be better if the operators of RT
> would
> consent to being the third and fourth party's. (Sorry if this puts RT
> on the
> spot).  In this way it might confirm your methods since I believe both
> of you
> have valuable services.  In a way it might keep many others off our
> list if
> they knew they might have to back up there claims with documented
> signals.
>  Just my thoughts.
> Lynn